Frankfurt, Germany — The European Union stands on the verge of a significant trade decision as Monday looms. Expectation builds over whether President Donald Trump will implement punishing tariffs on goods imported from the EU, a move that could have vast consequences for companies and consumers across both the Atlantic.
Earlier this month, President Trump instituted a 20% import tax on all products manufactured in the EU, as part of a broader initiative targeting nations with which the United States has a trade imbalance. However, in a bid to calm financial markets and facilitate negotiations, he subsequently paused these nation-specific tariffs until July 9, reverting to a standard rate of 10%.
In a statement reflecting his dissatisfaction with the EU’s position in trade discussions, Trump indicated that he would raise the potential tariff rate for European exports to as high as 50%. Such an increase would significantly escalate prices on a wide range of goods, including French cheese, Italian leather goods, German electronics, and Spanish pharmaceuticals.
The European Commission, responsible for handling trade matters among the EU’s 27 member states, expressed hope for striking a favorable agreement with the Trump administration. However, should negotiations falter, the EU has reiterated its readiness to retaliate with tariffs on hundreds of American products, including beef, auto parts, beer, and Boeing airplanes.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent commented on CNN’s “State of the Union,” noting that while the EU was slow to engage, discussions have recently been progressing well.
Trade between the U.S. and the EU is extraordinarily significant. According to the European Commission, this relationship is deemed the most important commercial partnership globally. In 2024, the value of goods and services exchanged between the EU and the U.S. reached an impressive 1.7 trillion euros (approximately $2 trillion), averaging around 4.6 billion euros daily according to EU statistics from Eurostat.
Crude oil was the most substantial U.S. export to Europe, followed closely by pharmaceuticals, aircraft, automobiles, and medical equipment. Conversely, Europe’s top exports to the U.S. included pharmaceuticals, cars, aircraft, chemicals, medical instruments, and wine and spirits.
Contrary to President Trump’s claims regarding trade deficits, the EU maintains a significant trade surplus with the U.S., amounting to 198 billion euros in goods. This indicates that Americans tend to purchase more from European businesses than the opposite.
Notably, while the EU surpasses the U.S. in goods exports, American companies excel in services. The outperformance of U.S. services, which include cloud computing, travel bookings, and legal and financial services, helps mitigate the trade imbalance. As a result, the overall trade deficit with the EU narrows to 50 billion euros ($59 billion), reflecting less than 3% of total U.S.-EU trade.
A number of complex issues currently divide the two trading powers. Under previous administrations, the U.S. and the EU generally enjoyed a cooperative trade relationship with low tariffs that averaged 1.47% for European goods and 1.35% for American products.
However, since February, the White House has adopted a more adversarial stance toward the EU. In addition to the fluctuating tariff rates proposed by President Trump, the EU is also facing a 50% tariff on steel and aluminum imports, as well as a 25% tax on imported cars and parts.
Trump’s administration has emphasized several concerns needing resolution, including agricultural trade barriers arising from EU health regulations that prohibit chlorine-washed chicken and hormone-treated beef. President Trump has also criticized the value-added taxes (VAT) imposed by EU countries, which range from 17% to 27%. Yet many economists perceive the VAT as trade-neutral since it applies to both domestic and imported goods. Moreover, the EU maintains that such national taxes, set through legislation, are not negotiable in trade discussions.
The complexities of addressing regulations, consumer standards, and tax structures make conceded adjustments unlikely. As Holger Schmieding, chief economist at Germany’s Berenberg bank, pointed out, the EU cannot modify the operation of its extensive internal market to comply with U.S. demands, which often stem from misunderstandings regarding EU functions.
Rising tariffs are predicted to lead to increased costs for U.S. consumers on imported items. Importers will face tough choices on whether to absorb additional tax costs through diminished profit margins or pass them on to consumers. For instance, dealers of Mercedes-Benz in the U.S. have stated they will maintain model year prices for 2025 “until further notice,” though they anticipate “significant increases” in the coming years.
Simon Hunt, the CEO of Italian wine and spirits producer Campari Group, indicated that pricing strategies may fluctuate based on competitors’ actions. If rival companies increase their prices, Campari might choose to retain existing pricing for products like Skyy vodka or Aperol aperitif to gain market share.
Trump posits that augmenting difficulty for foreign companies to operate in the U.S. will lead to a resurgence in American manufacturing; however, many industry leaders have expressed skepticism about the timeline for such economic benefits. Some companies have shown readiness to shift parts of their production to the U.S. For example, France-based luxury conglomerate LVMH, which owns brands like Tiffany & Co. and Louis Vuitton, may relocate some production stateside, as noted by billionaire CEO Bernard Arnault at the company’s annual meeting in April.
Arnault, who attended President Trump’s inauguration, encouraged the EU to negotiate based on reciprocal concessions. He warned that a failure to reach a compromise could compel companies to increase U.S.-based production to circumvent tariffs, stating, “If we end up with high tariffs, … we will be forced to increase our U.S.-based production to avoid tariffs. And if Europe fails to negotiate intelligently, that will be the consequence for many companies. … It will be the fault of Brussels, if it comes to that.”
No matter the outcomes of discussions, the forecasts indicate that the U.S. economy could bear the brunt of any stagnation in negotiations. In a report from Bruegel, a think tank based in Brussels, projections signal that if tariffs of 10% to 25% are enacted on European goods, the EU would experience a diminishment of 0.3% of its gross domestic product (GDP), while U.S. GDP might decline by 0.7%.
Considering the intricate nature of the issues at hand, it’s plausible that the two sides may only finalize a framework agreement before the set deadline of Wednesday. This agreement would likely preserve a 10% base tariff, alongside the extant auto, steel, and aluminum tariffs, until more formal agreements can be established.
Analysts often suggest that the most likely scenario would involve the U.S. agreeing to moderate its most severe demands, potentially retracting threats of far-reaching ‘retaliatory’ tariffs in excess of 10%. However, the path toward achieving this resolution may be fraught with difficulties.
The U.S. could provide exemptions for selected goods, which could facilitate negotiation. In exchange, the EU might consider lightening regulations perceived by the White House as trade obstacles.
Although President Trump might present such developments as victories, economists warn that the true victims of his protectionist policies would ultimately be U.S. consumers.
image source from：nbcnews
