The urgent need for a sophisticated defense system known as the ‘Golden Dome’ has emerged in light of escalating threats from revisionist states, particularly in light of recent conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East.
These conflicts have unveiled significant limitations of traditional air defenses, especially against new-generation missiles.
In Ukraine, Russia has notably increased the use of Iskander-M missiles, which have demonstrated the ability to evade even advanced defense systems like the Patriot.
Additionally, hypersonic missiles such as the Zircon and Kinzhal have been deployed various times, further complicating defensive measures.
On the other side in the Middle East, Iran’s introduction of hypersonic missiles like the Fattah-1 has tested the effectiveness of Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense system, amplifying concerns over security measures in the region.
As things stand, the United States lacks operational hypersonic missiles, posing a significant disadvantage against these rising threats.
The ‘Golden Dome’ initiative, unveiled by President Donald Trump in May of this year, seeks to address these vulnerabilities by establishing a multi-layered defense architecture comprising both ground-based and space-based interceptors.
This comprehensive system is designed to intercept enemy missiles—whether ballistic, cruise, or hypersonic—at any stage of their trajectory, leveraging advanced technology including a network of sensors distributed across land, sea, air, and space.
However, criticisms of the initiative have emerged, particularly from adversarial nations such as Russia and China.
Russia has ramped up the production of the Oreshnik hypersonic missile, which was developed specifically to counter US defense systems.
With a striking range of up to 3,425 miles and the capability to carry nuclear warheads, its debut operational use in November 2024 during a strike on a Ukrainian military installation marks a concerning development.
Furthermore, General Michael Guetlein, a senior commander of the US Space Force, highlighted China’s swift advancements in hypersonic technology, recalling Beijing’s successful test in 2021 involving a nuclear-capable missile using a hypersonic glide vehicle.
This missile, which reaches speeds exceeding five times the speed of sound, demonstrated a fractional orbital bombing maneuver that complicates detection and interception efforts.
Additionally, North Korea is also noted for making significant progress in developing similar hypersonic missiles, amplifying the urgency for the ‘Golden Dome’ system.
The supportive remarks from Lockheed Martin, a key player in defense manufacturing, stressed the initiative’s importance, labeling it ‘urgent and essential to the security of the country.’
However, alongside potential defense solutions, the project has drawn sharp international backlash.
Moscow and Beijing have both condemned the ‘Golden Dome,’ characterizing it as an ‘unrestricted, multi-layered global missile defense system’ that threatens to destabilize the strategic balance.
North Korea was particularly blunt, denouncing the project through state media as a ‘scenario for nuclear war in outer space’ and accusing it of advancing a strategy of ‘unipolar domination.’
The projected budget for the ‘Golden Dome’ system is staggering, estimated to reach around 175 billion dollars upon completion.
Investment is anticipated to escalate in phases: 17.6 billion dollars in the year 2026, 50 billion dollars in 2027, and 100 billion dollars in 2028.
In comparison, experts have likened the ‘Golden Dome’ initiative to the historical ‘Manhattan Project,’ underlining the substantial financial commitment necessary for developing such advanced space-based defensive technology.
Currently, the program’s implementation is occurring in phases, beginning with the integration of sensors and satellite tracking systems capable of detecting missiles in flight.
However, the technology necessary for intercepting these missiles is still under development and does not guarantee short-term success.
Moreover, the existing ground-based interceptors have recorded a success rate of only about 20% in tests, leading to uncertainty regarding the system’s operational effectiveness.
Given these factors, experts rate the possibility of having a fully operational system in just three years as overly optimistic, predicting that a functional version may take a decade or more to develop.
From a strategic lens, various analysts have expressed concerns that the ‘Golden Dome’ project could inadvertently destabilize global balance rather than reinforce it.
The reasoning suggests that advanced defensive capabilities could provoke adversaries to develop increasingly sophisticated offensive weapons aimed at evading or undermining this system in high-stakes situations.
This phenomenon resonates with the classic arms race paradox; defensive advancements often drive rival states towards offensive innovation.
Military analyst William Lawson noted that while the ‘Golden Dome’ signifies a considerable advance in defense capabilities, it does not automatically ensure strategic security.
For credible deterrence to be maintained, it is suggested that the United States should complement its defensive measures with the development of hypersonic offensive capabilities capable of restoring balance through the threat of retaliation.
Further backing of such an ambitious defense could lead the country to adopt more aggressive policies internationally, propelled by an illusion of invulnerability.
This newfound confidence could undermine the security of US allies and induce other powers to augment their nuclear arsenals as a preventive strategy.
image source from：atalayar
