The political landscape of student activism often finds its voice in university campuses, where protests have historically emerged as a crucial element of social change. From the fervent protests against the Vietnam War in the 1960s to the contemporary movements like Black Lives Matter and climate activism, universities have served as the focal point for calls to action. At the University of Texas (UT), noteworthy protests have punctuated recent years, including the ‘Cocks not Glocks’ campaign in 2016 and the Black Lives Matter movement in 2020.
A core feature of these protests is not only the highlighted injustices but also a set of demands aimed at addressing various issues. Among these demands, a significant focus has been the call for the UT endowment to divest from industries that activists consider problematic, such as fossil fuel companies during climate protests. This emphasis on divestment reflects a broader societal trend, where activists seek to influence institutional investments by targeting university endowments.
Endowments play a critical role in balancing the financial needs of current and future students. The UT system manages an impressive endowment, valued at approximately $45 billion. The management strategy of these funds is designed to allow continuous support for current educational needs while ensuring that future generations also benefit from this financial foundation. Each year, a portion of the endowment is allocated for use, while the remaining assets are invested by the University of Texas/Texas A&M Investment Management Company (UTIMCO).
UTIMCO’s investment strategy traditionally emphasizes diversification, which is seen as a means to mitigate risk. However, as demands for politically motivated divestments grow, the challenge arises where what is economically optimal might not align with political expectations. The reality is, activists are more empowered and have more immediate access to influence their university’s financial decisions than they do federal or state government policies.
The focus on divestment from the endowment might seem like a plausible approach for activists; however, it’s essential to recognize that such a strategy may serve as a mere distraction from potentially more impactful solutions. Divesting from companies like Exxon Mobil does not inherently lead to tangible change in the company’s practices; it merely shifts ownership to other investors who may not prioritize social responsibility. Thus, lowering Exxon’s stock price as a result of divestment can inadvertently create opportunities for other investors who do not share activist values.
Moreover, it’s crucial to consider that if the endowment were managed with political considerations, such an approach to divestment could prove counterproductive. Companies often prioritize shareholder voices, meaning that active, engaged ownership could enable more meaningful influence over a company’s actions. For instance, in 2021, an activist firm purchased shares in Exxon Mobil and employed proxy tactics to shift the company’s climate policies.
The central mission of UTIMCO is to generate superior long-term investment returns that support the systems of The University of Texas and Texas A&M University. Introducing non-financial constraints might not only endanger the financial health of the endowment but also detract from its primary purpose, which is to fund research and educational initiatives. It is worth noting that political decisions impacting the endowment, such as calls for divestment from firms engaged in oil or ties to China, illustrate a politicization of financial resources.
Student activists are encouraged to bear in mind that while protests can amplify the visibility of a cause, they should also pursue practical solutions. Other methods, such as organizing clubs, contacting legislators, or volunteering for campaigns, can facilitate meaningful change beyond symbolic gestures.
However, it is also recognized that protests serve a broader purpose by fostering unity and spreading a movement’s message. As government and Plan I honors student Arshia Papari asserts, protests build momentum for movements that aim for eventual outcomes.
In conclusion, while the UT endowment remains an accessible target for student activists, focusing predominantly on its divestments may obscure opportunities for more effective change. Rather than prioritizing symbolic actions that might have minimal real-world impact, students are urged to explore diverse avenues for promoting social progress, ensuring their efforts result in genuine advancements for the causes they are passionate about.
image source from：thedailytexan
