Former President Jair Bolsonaro of Brazil has been mandated to wear an ankle monitor following a Supreme Court order that restricts his movements and communications. He termed the situation as “a supreme humiliation” as federal police conducted searches at his residence and the headquarters of his political party in Brasília.
This recent development comes as Bolsonaro is embroiled in a trial at the Supreme Court, where he faces accusations of orchestrating an attempt to stage a coup to annul the results of the 2022 election, which saw him defeated by Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, representing the left-wing.
The court’s order subjects Bolsonaro to several limitations; he cannot leave his home during nighttime, communicate with foreign ambassadors and diplomats, or approach embassies. Additionally, he is prohibited from using social media or contacting other individuals implicated in the Supreme Court investigation, including his son, Eduardo Bolsonaro, who resides in the United States and maintains close ties to President Donald Trump.
After donning the ankle monitor, Bolsonaro expressed his sentiments to journalists in Brasília, asserting that he had never intended to leave Brazil or seek refuge at an embassy. He labeled the precautionary measures as unnecessary constraints on his freedom.
In an expression of solidarity, President Donald Trump reached out to Bolsonaro, condemning the treatment faced by his political ally within the Brazilian judiciary as unjust. He called for an immediate conclusion to the trial, stating: “This trial should end immediately!” Trump also highlighted his discontent through a recent tariff policy affecting Brazil.
Consequent to these events, the U.S. State Department announced new visa restrictions targeting Brazilian judicial officials as part of a wider strategy to hold accountable those perceived as abusing judicial authority. Secretary of State Marco Rubio indicated that visa revocations would affect members of the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court, including Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is overseeing Bolsonaro’s case.
Rubio emphasized that Moraes’s actions represent a political witch hunt against Bolsonaro that not only violates basic rights of Brazilians but also stretches to impact American citizens.
The Supreme Court’s limitations on Bolsonaro arise from a secondary investigation concerning Eduardo Bolsonaro. Allegations suggest Eduardo collaborated with U.S. officials to impose sanctions on Brazilian leaders. In light of these developments, Moraes commented on recent actions taken by the former president and his son as evidence of a blatant confession of criminal behavior, including attempts to obstruct legal processes and disrupt national sovereignty.
Eduardo Bolsonaro took to X (formerly Twitter) to voice his disapproval of Moraes’s stance, citing the ban on communication between him and his father as emblematic of the ongoing hatred directed towards them. His brother, Senator Flávio Bolsonaro, also expressed indignation about the situation on the platform, calling it a manifestation of deep-seated animosity.
As federal police carried out their investigation, live aerial footage broadcasted by local stations displayed police vehicles stationed outside Bolsonaro’s home in Brasília. Congressman Sóstenes Cavalcante, leader of Bolsonaro’s party in the lower house, characterized the ongoing legal actions as a continuation of oppression against conservative figures in Brazil, alleging political motivations behind the investigations.
Bolsonaro’s legal representation has yet to release a public statement regarding the recent court orders or the investigation.
Earlier this week, Brazil’s Prosecutor-General Paulo Gonet submitted a report to the Supreme Court asserting that the evidence against Bolsonaro depicted a systematic effort to incite insurrection and undermine the democratic process both during and after his administration.
In his defense, Bolsonaro labeled the trial as a “witch hunt,” mirroring language previously used by Trump in his own defense. Recently, Trump announced a substantial 50% import tax on Brazilian goods, stating that such tariffs were a direct response to Bolsonaro’s trial proceedings.
While the political climate intensifies both within Brazil and on the international stage, sources from Brazil’s Supreme Court suggest that some justices believe U.S. tariffs will not influence the judiciary’s decisions regarding Bolsonaro’s case. The trial proceedings are anticipated to continue between August and September, despite external political pressure and outcry.
As the situation evolves, the implications for Bolsonaro and Brazilian politics remain to be seen, with broader effects potentially rippling into U.S.-Brazil relations.
image source from：apnews
