A critical component of Texas public education, the state’s accountability framework undergoes changes every five years, affecting how schools measure success and allocate resources. This system includes a pivotal standard known as “college, career and military readiness,” or CCMR, which significantly influences the overall grading of schools and districts. More successful graduates who meet various readiness targets help improve these grades, resulting in increased funding for schools.
Recognizing the significance of CCMR, researchers Gabriela Sánchez-Soto and Mauricio Molina from the Kinder Institute’s Houston Education Research Consortium have spent the past year scrutinizing Texas’ approach to its accountability measures. Their evaluation acknowledges both the achievements in creating pathways for postsecondary readiness and identifies key areas needing improvement.
The study reveals that, although Texas education leaders aimed for a transparent, rigorous grading system, the development of CCMR standards occasionally faced hurdles. Notably, the disconnect between state officials and community representatives sometimes hindered effective policymaking. Despite the introduction of diverse pathways to cater to students’ varying needs, persistent gaps in readiness among students from different racial, ethnic, and economic backgrounds remained unchanged.
A primary concern in the research is that Texas’ accountability system constantly evolves, often outpacing schools’ ability to keep pace with the changes. This framework, legally intended to stay stable for five years, allowed the Texas Education Agency (TEA) some leeway to alter CCMR metrics, including adding industry certifications for additional credit. The continuous revisions leave some local educators struggling to adjust, particularly amid the abrupt disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Advisory committee members reported disconnects in communication with the TEA, leading to frustrations about their recommendations being ignored. Such coordination issues hindered meaningful dialogue and made it challenging for school districts to adapt to the evolving standards. The study suggests the establishment of a more formalized decision-making process that leverages the insights of advisory committees for better transparency and inclusivity.
Moreover, the researchers observed a volatility in students’ CCMR readiness rates in recent years. Following a significant overhaul of the CCMR framework in 2017-18, readiness rates experienced a steep decline from 76% to 54% within a single year due to the abrupt changes implemented without adequate time for adaptation. Fortunately, these rates rebounded within two years, although they faced another dip due to the pandemic. For the Class of 2023, readiness rates returned to 76%, partly reflecting effective strategies adopted by district leaders to enhance graduate outcomes.
Disparities in CCMR rates among different demographic groups, however, painted a mixed picture of progress. The gap between students receiving special education services and the state average saw a notable reduction, indicating that changes made to the framework were effective for this demographic. Similarly, emergent bilingual students also benefitted from improvements, although attributing these successes to specific initiatives remains complex given the lack of comprehensive data.
In contrast, gaps in performance for Black, Hispanic, and economically disadvantaged students largely remained stagnant. Addressing these disparities is imperative if Texas aims to provide equitable postsecondary readiness pathways. Researchers advocate for targeted programs aiming to bridge these gaps and facilitate success for historically underserved populations.
As Texas anticipates the next update of its accountability system in 2028, the findings present key recommendations for enhancing communication and systemic stability. A balanced approach that allows schools adequate time to adjust to CCMR updates can lead to a more equitable educational landscape.
Furthermore, enhancing collaboration between state officials and advisory groups can foster trust and transparency, ensuring that diverse voices contribute to policymaking. With these adjustments, Texas can strive towards a more inclusive and equitable accountability system that prepares all students for future success.
image source from：kinder
