The Massachusetts House of Representatives has approved a $1.3 billion supplemental budget aimed at enhancing education and transportation across the state.
Passed with a significant majority of 140 to 14, the budget now heads to the Senate for further consideration.
The funds generated from a recent surtax on taxpayers earning over $1 million annually will be allocated primarily for education-related projects and transportation initiatives.
Specifically, the budget will direct $353 million to education projects and approximately $828 million for various transportation-related expenses.
House Speaker Ron Mariano commented on the significance of this budget, stating, “Ensuring that every Massachusetts resident has access to a safe and reliable public transportation system and that every student in the commonwealth receives a high-quality education are two of the most fundamental responsibilities that we have as elected officials.”
He emphasized that the budget reflects the House’s commitment to these responsibilities and is made possible through years of careful financial planning.
Rep. Aaron Michlewitz, chair of the House Committee on Ways and Means, also highlighted that the utilization of these surplus funds presents a unique opportunity to strengthen the commonwealth significantly in several areas.
He noted, “By further improving our educational and transportation sectors, we will build off the work we have done in the last several budget cycles with a judicious use of the Fair Share funds.”
Critics of the budget have raised concerns regarding the distribution of funds, particularly in regard to the focus on the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA).
Rep. Marc Lombardo, a Republican representative from Billerica, criticized the majority of funding directed toward the MBTA, arguing that it prioritized “pork barrel spending” over necessary support for cities and towns.
He expressed disappointment that critical funding for roads and bridges benefiting all communities was overshadowed by substantial allocations to the MBTA, stating, “Overall, the bill failed to provide comprehensive financial support to communities across the commonwealth. Beacon Hill needs to do better.”
Another Republican representative, Joe McKenna from Webster, articulated concerns over the disparity in funding, stressing that the significant allocation to the MBTA left many cities and towns without direct access to its resources feeling neglected.
The House also voted on an amendment proposing to reduce MBTA funding by $50 million and redirect these funds to municipalities for local road improvements.
This amendment was rejected in a vote of 25 to 125, with Rep. McKenna arguing that the measure would promote regional equity in transportation infrastructure by allocating funds based on each municipality’s local road mileage instead of population.
Rep. James Arciero, a Democrat from Westford, countered McKenna’s argument by advocating for a comprehensive discussion on road funding that involves public input, asserting that the subject would be more appropriately discussed during scheduled public hearings of the Transportation Committee.
This week on Beacon Hill also saw discussions surrounding a proposed amendment regarding transgender students’ participation in school sports.
Freshman Rep. John Gaskey (R-Carver) suggested an amendment that would prohibit biological males from competing on girls’ teams and vice versa.
However, this proposal was effectively stalled when Rep. Ken Gordon (D-Bedford) introduced an amendment to delay any decision until the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education conducts a study on the impacts of such a ban.
Rep. Gaskey criticized the delay, stating that a further study was unnecessary and would only serve to obscure the need for immediate action on the matter.
In other legislative news, a hearing was held regarding a proposed measure allowing Massachusetts residents to contribute to a special United Nations fund on their income tax forms to assist less developed countries in addressing climate change challenges.
The proposal drew criticism from some, including Paul Craney, executive director of the Massachusetts Fiscal Alliance, who labeled the bill as impractical amid rising utility and energy costs in the state.
Supporters of the initiative argue that the option to donate to the fund aligns with the state’s commitment to combat climate change, building on existing “tax check-off” options available on income tax returns.
Sen. Mike Barrett (D-Lexington), the bill’s sponsor, did not comment on the proposal despite multiple outreach attempts from Beacon Hill Roll Call.
Another bill heard by the Judiciary Committee proposed requiring public hearings in major cities on any tax hikes or new taxes being considered by the legislature.
Sen. Patrick O’Connor (R-Weymouth), the sponsor of the bill, emphasized the necessity of transparency in tax-related discussions, hoping to foster better communication and trust between lawmakers and the public.
In a hearing addressing various bills, one proposed constitutional amendment aimed to protect property rights by restricting government seizure of private property for private commercial use without the owner’s consent.
This proposal emerged as a response to the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Kelo v. New London case, which allowed the government more leeway in eminent domain claims.
Additionally, legislation aimed at prohibiting wagering on political outcomes was discussed, reflecting growing concerns over the integrity of election processes in Massachusetts amid the rise of online gambling.
The measure, introduced by Sen. Jake Oliveira (D-Ludlow), focuses on maintaining the integrity of political decision-making by banning bets on elections and legislative outcomes.
Finally, a significant bill titled “Conrad’s Law” was presented to criminalize coerced suicide, linked to the high-profile case of Conrad Roy, who died after being pushed to take his own life by his girlfriend, Michelle Carter.
Sen. Barry Finegold (D-Andover) stated that the proposed legislation seeks to address the issue of coerced suicide proactively, aiming to prevent further tragedies.
In terms of legislative session duration, the House convened for a total of seven hours and 26 minutes, while the Senate only met for 20 minutes during the week of April 7-11.
This reflects ongoing critiques regarding the legislative body’s efficiency and work habits.
Overall, the legislative actions taken this week on Beacon Hill illustrate the ongoing discussions regarding funding priorities, social issues, and the functionality of state laws affecting the public in Massachusetts.
image source from：https://franklinobserver.town.news/g/franklin-town-ma/n/297954/beacon-hill-rollcall
