In a bold move echoing his administration’s agenda, President Donald Trump is advocating for the complete elimination of federal funding for the Head Start program. If Congress supports this proposal, it would end approximately 5,700 Head Start slots in San Diego County, severely impacting thousands of vulnerable children and their families.
Arnulfo Manriquez, the CEO of the Metropolitan Area Advisory Committee (MAAC), a local Head Start provider, expressed his concerns, stating, “These opportunities open doors, not just for the children but for the entire family. It will absolutely not improve the community by eliminating it like this.”
Established over sixty years ago by President Lyndon B. Johnson as a key element of the War on Poverty, Head Start is designed to deliver comprehensive early education and child care services to low-income children aged infants to five years. It also provides essential wraparound services aimed at assisting families in escaping poverty.
Local Head Start programs within San Diego County offer health screenings, meals, mental health support, food distributions, and referrals to housing and job training programs. Families earning at or below the federal poverty line, which is currently set at $32,150 for a family of four, can qualify for Head Start.
Avo Madkessian, the executive director of First 5 California, highlighted the dire situation for children enrolled in Head Start, noting, “When you adjust for that cost of living, children in Head Start in California are facing the deepest poverty.”
Last fiscal year alone, California received $1.7 billion in Head Start funding, which allowed the program to serve 84,200 children, according to the program’s official website. This included an alarming count of 2,800 foster youths, over 8,000 children experiencing homelessness, and 53,000 English learners.
A preliminary budget document indicates that the White House aims to eliminate Head Start as part of a broader initiative to decentralize educational control by transferring authority to states and parents. The administration posits that the federal government should not dictate curriculum, locations, or performance standards for educational programs, as reported by the Associated Press.
However, children’s advocates are expressing grave concerns that cutting Head Start will strip away crucial support systems for vulnerable children’s health and developmental needs. They stress that the economic ramifications could also be severe, as many parents dependent on Head Start may find it challenging to maintain employment without accessible child care options.
The cuts could lead to hundreds of job losses in local Head Start programs. Damon Carson, the general education manager for the Neighborhood House Association, which serves 5,000 children and receives $97 million annually from Head Start, confirmed, “If we lose our funding, we will have to cut jobs, and ultimately, we won’t be able to serve the children who need us most.”
MAAC, which currently employs 320 people for its Head Start services and pays for an additional 180 subcontracted roles, similarly stands to take a significant hit. Manriquez remarked, “If we lose that funding, we would not be able to go fundraise to continue this work—absolutely not.”
With a current waiting list of 900 families for the Neighborhood House Association’s services, the prospect of defunding Head Start is daunting. As Madkessian stated, “Head Start funding was already not serving all children in poverty in California. The prospect of it being completely defunded would be catastrophic to our state.”
Arisha Peabody, a San Diego resident originally from Malaysia, shared her experience, highlighting the invaluable support her 2-year-old son receives at a North Park Head Start center. Born prematurely and with specific health needs, her son’s care is crucial for Peabody, who has been using the time he is in Head Start to pursue a professional qualification.
“I would not be able to afford child care for him out-of-pocket,” Peabody stated. “There’s no other place we can get such quality child care.”
The potential elimination of Head Start funding also raises fears for early education providers already dealing with the anxiety stirred by the Trump administration’s immigration policies. The early education workforce predominantly comprises immigrants, with data from the Center for the Study of Child Care Employment suggesting this figure ranges from 10% to 19% depending on the child care setting.
Many families relying on federally funded child care, such as those who benefit from Head Start, are themselves not U.S. citizens or are part of mixed-status families, heightening their vulnerability under current policies. “It has been a sense of fear, stress and anxiety across the board in all of our programs, both with staff and with participants,” Manriquez noted. “It affects people wanting to go to work and wanting to even enroll in a program.”
Highlighting the unique challenges faced by families, Madkessian remarked about a specific Head Start program designed for migrant workers. Administrators fear that operating this season could expose them to targets for immigration enforcement, compounding the existing pressures.
Trump’s proposal to eliminate Head Start funding is part of a wider series of policies that advocates fear will negatively affect vulnerable young children. From cuts to Medicaid, which provides essential health insurance and health services to children, to tariffs impacting the supply and cost of baby products, the implications of these strategies are alarming for those committed to protecting the well-being of America’s youngest.
Madkessian concluded with grave concern, stating, “What we’re seeing is just a comprehensive assault on the health and well-being of our nation’s most vulnerable babies. It’s deeply, deeply concerning, because Head Start is not in isolation.”
image source from：https://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/2025/04/20/gutting-head-start-would-end-services-to-thousands-of-san-diego-families-cut-hundreds-of-jobs/
