Thursday

05-01-2025 Vol 1947

The First 100 Days of Trump’s Second Term: A Deep Dive into Policy and Controversy

The first 100 days of President Trump’s second term have been marked by aggressive executive actions and significant controversy across a range of issues.

On Day 1, Trump signed a series of executive orders focusing on the establishment of the informal Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), dismantling diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts, and modifying immigration policies, including the rejection of birthright citizenship for children born in the U.S. to undocumented parents.

Additionally, Trump declared a national emergency at the southern border, emphasizing a strict binary defining of gender as strictly male and female.

As his administration has sought to implement various tariffs on imported goods and restructure the federal government, Trump has demonstrated a firm intent to consolidate power while penalizing perceived political adversaries.

However, this bold approach has not come without turbulence, highlighted by the recent Signalgate scandal involving multiple senior officials, legal setbacks concerning deportations, and controversy surrounding government layoffs and cuts to programs.

Significant shifts in public perception have occurred as well; recent polls indicate that Trump’s approval ratings have taken a dive, particularly regarding his handling of trade and immigration issues.

### Governmental Overhaul and Power Consolidation

In a push for greater control, Trump has instigated a substantial overhaul of federal agencies, resulting in the dismissal of numerous inspectors general across various domains.

Leaders who were deemed insufficiently loyal to Trump have also been purged, and in an attempt to further diminish traditional media influence, he has welcomed more favorable news outlets while restricting access to journalists.

His administration has initiated the firing of thousands of federal employees and proposed buyouts for many more, leading to significant cuts in funding for numerous federally authorized programs, including critical areas such as scientific research, Head Start, and low-income heating assistance.

Complete agencies, such as the USAID, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and the Department of Education, are in the process of being dismantled.

While these budget cuts seem minor in the grand scheme, they reflect a broader goal of instilling a sense of fear among federal workers, as confirmed by Trump’s budget director, Russ Vought, who had previously indicated a desire for federal employees to experience “trauma.”

Elon Musk, who has emerged as a prominent figure in the administration, spearheaded the efforts to restructure the federal government via DOGE.

Musk’s public presence was emphasized during his meetings with Trump, flaunting a “Tech Support” T-shirt during Cabinet meetings and appearing in joint interviews.

However, as Musk’s influence waned amid pushback from constituents dissatisfied with his initiatives, questions about the efficacy of DOGE have arisen.

Despite pouring millions into a Wisconsin judicial race, the conservative candidate aligned with Musk lost decisively, leading to speculation regarding the sustainability of Musk’s role in the administration.

### Immigration Crackdown and Deportations

Trump’s stance on immigration has mirrored his campaign promises; while highlighting a focus on deporting “criminals,” numerous cases have arisen involving nonviolent immigrants facing harsh repercussions.

Individuals like Kilmar Abrego Garcia, whose case has gained significant media attention, exemplify the broader implications of the administration’s policies, having been erroneously deported despite long-standing legal protections.

Trump’s administration has resorted to nontraditional locations for detaining immigrants, including military prisons in Guantanamo Bay and maximum security facilities in El Salvador.

The administration’s refusal to accept judicial recommendations emphasizes its defiance, sparking debates about constitutional law and presidential authority.

As the administration grapples with challenges and judicial pushback in its deportation efforts, Trump appears determined to test the boundaries of executive power, relying on a supportive conservative Supreme Court.

### Trade Wars and Economic Impact

In an unusual move for a new administration, Trump opted to wield his initial political capital in the realm of international trade.

For years, he has expressed disdain for foreign nations that he believes exploit the United States, proposing tariffs as a means to reclaim economic dominance.

However, the ensuing trade wars have resulted in unpredictable results, adversely affecting relationships with trading partners and global economic stability.

The ramifications have become apparent, with Wall Street experiencing a historically poor performance in response to Trump’s aggressive tariff policies, which, in turn, has further impacted his standing among voters.

### Foreign Policy Shifts

Trump’s approach to foreign policy has moved away from traditional United States advocacy for democracy and human rights, opting instead for an alliance with authoritarian regimes.

His interactions with leaders such as Hungary’s Viktor Orbán and Russia’s Vladimir Putin underscore a distinct shift from previous U.S. leadership styles, favoring cooperation with contentious global figures.

During a critical meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy aimed at addressing the conflict with Russia, Trump’s dismissive approach raised eyebrows, as he downplayed Ukraine’s plight and external challenges.

Trump’s diplomatic maneuvering has also been marked by an eagerness to strike deals, the results of which have yet to materialize, particularly concerning relations with Iran and the ongoing violence in Gaza.

His bold proclamations, including pseudo-territorial acquisitions, reflect a provocative stance on international relations, straying from established diplomatic protocol.

### Retribution for Political Opponents

The theme of retribution has permeated Trump’s presidency, especially against those he perceives as adversaries.

In alignment with his campaign rhetoric, Trump has vowed to hold individuals he believes undermined his presidency accountable through potential criminal proceedings.

This has manifested in several ways—most notably through the pardoning of individuals involved in the January 6 Capitol riots and systematic inquiries against his critics, including firing or stripping security clearances from key figures.

As part of these punitive measures, Trump has even rescinded security protection for the children of his political rivals, a move that has drawn considerable critique.

### Culture Wars: Targeting DEI and Transgender Rights

Trump’s administration has launched an aggressive campaign against diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives while challenging rights for transgender and nonbinary individuals.

Executive orders have been signed to weaken DEI efforts within government and military sectors, and the administration has pursued legal action against states and educational institutions supporting DEI initiatives.

This has included the removal of historical representations from government properties, and the censoring of materials deemed offensive to traditional American values, reflecting a broader agenda to reshape historical discourse.

### Scandal: Signalgate

Amidst a landscape of significant policy initiatives lies the emergence of the Signalgate scandal—a situation exacerbated by the handling of sensitive military operations by Trump’s administration.

The controversy began when critical military details were leaked through informal communication channels, raising questions about national security practices.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s controversial responses further compounded the issue, as it became evident that sensitive information had been disseminated widely, crossing lines of confidentiality.

Despite the backlash, Trump has publicly defended Hegseth, leading to broader questions regarding accountability and operational transparency within the administration.

As the first 100 days of Trump’s second term conclude, all eyes remain on the administration’s policy trajectories and their real-world consequences.

Time will reveal the depth of Trump’s pursuits as he continues to navigate the complexities of governance amidst political dissent and judicial scrutiny.

image source from:https://www.npr.org/2025/04/30/nx-s1-5379594/trump-100-days

Abigail Harper