NEW YORK — In a significant turn of events, Harvey Weinstein has decided not to testify at his retrial for sex crimes in New York, according to his lawyer, Arthur Aidala.
This choice paves the way for closing arguments to commence on Tuesday, following days of emotionally charged testimony from the accusers.
Weinstein is facing serious charges related to incidents with Jessica Mann, Miriam Haley, and Kaja Sokola, which allegedly occurred in 2013 and 2006 respectively.
Mann, a former actor and hairstylist, Haley, a production assistant and producer, and Sokola, a model with aspirations in acting, all provided detailed and harrowing accounts of their experiences at the hands of Weinstein.
Their testimonies painted a disturbing picture of how Weinstein allegedly lured them into private spaces under the pretense of advancing their careers, only to assault them.
As the trial, which has reignited discussions surrounding the #MeToo movement, advances towards closing arguments, it remains uncertain if the jury will begin deliberations on Tuesday afternoon or Wednesday.
Weinstein has a history of not testifying at his previous trials in New York and California, where he was found guilty in both instances.
His decision to remain silent in this retrial was considered fraught, reflecting the complex dynamics of legal strategy where defendants are not compelled to testify, often due to the risks of cross-examination by prosecution.
Aidala noted that Weinstein was weighing the potential implications of his testimony against the jurors’ likely expectations of hearing from him.
Despite his silence, Weinstein has been an active observer during the proceedings, often expressing visible reactions to the testimonies of his accusers and conferring with his legal team.
The defense has presented several witnesses, including a unique case where a transcript of a earlier testimony was read to the jury, as one of the previous defense witnesses, Talita Maia, was unavailable for the retrial.
Maia recounted her previous friendship with Mann and stated she had not heard any mention of assault from Mann during their time together in 2013, casting doubt on Mann’s accusations.
Alongside Maia’s testimony, another defense witness, Thomas Richards, echoed similar sentiments, stating he did not observe anything concerning during a meeting shortly after the alleged incident involving Mann.
Mann, however, disclosed that her reasons for not reporting the assault at the time were rooted in fear and disbelief that her claims would be taken seriously.
The defense further introduced Helga Samuelsen, a friend of Sokola, who testified to a brief encounter between Weinstein and Sokola without any indications of misconduct, which Sokola has refuted.
The tension in the courtroom has been palpable throughout the trial, with accusers sharing their distressing narratives while the defense challenges the veracity of those accounts.
Notably, the Associated Press typically refrains from identifying individuals who claim to have been sexually assaulted; however, Mann, Haley, and Sokola have consented to being named publicly.
As the trial approaches its conclusion, both sides are preparing for a critical phase that may ultimately determine Weinstein’s fate in the ongoing legal battle against serious charges of sexual misconduct.
image source from：https://www.fox61.com/article/news/nation-world/harvey-weinstein-doesnt-plan-testify-at-retrial/507-e811806c-d04d-433d-af5b-e2b420c3d1db
