As Senate Republican leaders aim to push a significant legislative package for President Donald Trump’s agenda by the July 4 deadline, they are navigating various competing demands from within their own ranks.
Several senators pose genuine threats to vote against the package, while others appear likely to ultimately support it after leveraging their demands for changes.
The loudest Republican voices are flagging a variety of potential amendments to the House-passed bill, as party leaders strive to address enough concerns to secure the necessary votes.
With all Democrats anticipated to oppose the legislation, Republicans require a minimum of 50 votes to pass it, putting Vice President JD Vance in a pivotal position to cast a tie-breaking vote if needed.
Among the senators closely monitored during this legislation push are Rand Paul, Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Mike Crapo, Thom Tillis, Ron Johnson, and Josh Hawley.
Sen. Rand Paul from Kentucky stands out as the only Republican senator to have consistently voted against the legislation throughout its various stages.
He has vocally criticized the significant increase in military spending, the massive deficit increase, and notably, the $5 trillion debt limit hike.
While Paul supports extending Trump’s 2017 tax cuts, he insists that these cuts must be matched with trillions of dollars in spending cuts.
Finding consensus among Republicans on such cuts appears unlikely, leading observers to expect his continued opposition to the bill.
In Maine, Sen. Susan Collins also provides a key vote.
As the sole GOP senator representing a state regularly carried by Democrats in presidential elections, Collins faces re-election this year, raising the stakes for her decision.
Her legislative journey has been revealing; she initially supported the budget resolution but shifted her stance to oppose the revised version, citing concerns over Medicaid cuts that threaten low-income and older constituents.
Additionally, she has expressed apprehensions about party plans to address waste and fraud in Medicare.
Collins, along with Sen. John Curtis from Utah, has voiced strong disapproval of overruling the Senate parliamentarian if policy measures are deemed non-compliant.
While she voted for the party’s 2017 tax law, her previous willingness to oppose major GOP initiatives gives reason for party leaders to take her demands seriously if they wish to secure her support for the current bill.
Sen. Lisa Murkowski, representing Alaska, has also raised a range of grievances following her support for the initial budget blueprint in April.
Murkowski has specifically criticized Medicaid cuts and her party’s accounting strategies that present the cost of tax cuts in a misleading manner.
Her concerns, expressed in a letter with colleagues urging attention to clean energy tax credits benefiting her state, have persisted as key elements in her decision-making process.
Murkowski’s independent streak and willingness to take risks politically further highlight her potential as a critical swing vote in these discussions.
Sen. Mike Crapo, the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, is also crucial in shaping the legislation, particularly regarding contentious tax cuts and potential Medicaid cuts.
His approach faces the challenge of appeasing both the Senate’s Republican caucus and the slim House Republican majority that narrowly passed its version of the bill.
For instance, the proposal to expand the $40,000 cap on state and local tax deductions has become a point of contention, primarily benefiting a group of blue-state Republicans from the House.
However, Crapo noted that there is currently no strong sentiment among Senate Republicans to expand the SALT deductions.
This bill thus marks a significant test of Crapo’s leadership and influence.
Sen. Thom Tillis from North Carolina has indicated a desire to refine the phase-out of clean energy tax credits, advocating for a more tailored approach to protect U.S. businesses with existing investments.
He expressed a sense of optimism regarding the bill but also acknowledged the complexity of meeting the Independence Day deadline, suggesting many conditions must align for that to happen.
Facing re-election in a battleground state where Democrats aim to compete aggressively, Tillis must navigate a tricky political landscape, balancing his responsibilities to the party with the need to retain favor within his constituency.
Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin has used his platform to challenge aspects of the bill, particularly its estimated $2.4 trillion impact on the deficit.
He dismissed the notion of a comprehensive mega-bill, advocating instead for breaking it down and limiting the debt ceiling increase.
Trump reportedly encouraged Johnson to adopt a more positive tone during a recent meeting, though Johnson remains cautious about endorsing the current legislation.
Previously, he demonstrated a capacity for change, having initially opposed the 2017 tax law but ultimately supporting it.
Lastly, Sen. Josh Hawley, representing Missouri, has emerged as a vocal critic of proposed Medicaid benefit cuts within the bill.
Hawley has articulated specific areas of concern, including the Medicaid provider tax and cost-sharing provisions.
While he does not oppose coverage losses due to Medicaid work requirements, he expressed strong disapproval of any measures that could endanger Medicare provisions, describing such attempts as detrimental to the GOP’s electoral future.
As deliberations move forward, it remains clear that the influence of these senators will significantly impact whether the legislation succeeds.
Republican leaders will need to balance varied demands while maintaining party unity if they hope to achieve legislative success ahead of the crucial July 4 deadline.
image source from：https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/7-senators-watch-republicans-make-changes-trumps-big-bill-rcna211134
