A recent anonymous player poll conducted among over 100 major league players has shed light on which managers and organizations are viewed positively or negatively within the sport.
The poll, conducted this spring, allowed players to express their opinions freely regarding opposing managers they would prefer playing for, as well as those they would not.
Interestingly, there was no unanimous decision among the players, but a significant number of them showed a preference for veterans in managerial roles.
Bruce Bochy, aged 70, emerged as the favorite manager for nearly one-sixth of the respondents, highlighting his experience and leadership style.
Terry Francona, at 66 years old, followed closely behind Bochy as a preferred choice, with players appreciating his unique blend of authority and approachability.
Stephen Vogt, only 40, was also a notable pick, receiving over 12 percent of the votes, underscoring a shift towards younger, relatable managers who were once players themselves.
Craig Counsell and Brian Snitker followed in popularity, each garnering mentions from about 7.4 and 5.7 percent of players respectively.
Other names such as Alex Cora and Aaron Boone were also mentioned, reflecting a diverse range of managerial styles.
In their comments, players highlighted the strengths of these managers.
One player remarked about Bochy’s longevity and the valuable lessons learned from him, while another described Francona as having an almost familial presence, likening his manner to a ‘young grandpa.’
Vogt’s prior playing career has certainly added to his rapport with current players, evidenced by comments praising his enjoyable presence and expected managerial skill.
In contrast, the least favored managers had a sharper delineation, with Bud Black and Oli Marmol tied for the most mentions at the bottom of the list.
The reasons offered by players highlighted issues with their teams rather than personal grievances against the managers themselves.
Players were quick to point out the unfortunate position such managers often find themselves in, especially in the case of Bud Black and the Colorado Rockies.
One player even caveated their vote for Black by noting the Rockies’ struggles.
A player stated their indecisiveness regarding Marmol, admitting to a lack of familiarity with many managers.
Interestingly, players’ perceptions seemed influenced by public persona and media coverage, with vague impressions forming the basis of their votes.
For instance, Mike Shildt of the Padres was critiqued for his public outbursts, while other names like Gabe Kapler were cited simply based on their previous roles and reputations within the league.
When considering organizations, a trend quickly emerged regarding clubs perceived to have inferior reputations.
Stemming from low payroll and struggling performance, the Athletics were named by the highest percentage of players, followed by the Chicago White Sox and Miami Marlins.
The Rockies, although tied with the Marlins, echoed sentiments of inconsistency and lack of direction, highlighting a wider discussion about team investment in success.
The Pittsburgh Pirates, venturing into notoriously frugal territory, were also mentioned as a team lacking commitment to winning.
Despite these negative perceptions, players expressed a fundamental appreciation for the opportunity to play in the major leagues, pointing out that few desired to eliminate teams from consideration altogether.
On the other hand, organizations with positive reputations were largely dominated by teams with a winning history or robust financial operations.
The Los Angeles Dodgers significantly outshone others in the poll, receiving the most mentions, emphasizing their successful blend of winning and caring for player well-being.
Players recognized their propensity to invest in top talent while also nurturing a supportive environment.
Following them were the New York Yankees, whose storied success and resources keep them at the forefront of major league options.
Comments related to these organizations often reflected a deep-seated appreciation for their commitment to player development and overall experience.
Teams like the Atlanta Braves and Chicago Cubs also earned high praise, with players noting their well-rounded approach to both competitiveness and player treatment.
The New York Mets were identified for their prioritization of family amenities within the organization, showcasing a player-centric approach.
Further down the list, teams like the Boston Red Sox and Cleveland Guardians were recognized for providing reputable resources, particularly in areas crucial for player performance.
Overall, the player poll offers a fascinating glimpse into the mindsets of MLB athletes regarding the dynamics of management and organizational reputation, prompting a broader conversation about what players truly value.
While performance on the field ultimately dictates success, the conditions surrounding players’ careers off the field undoubtedly shape their aspirations and professional satisfaction.
image source from：https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6406636/2025/06/11/best-worst-mlb-manager-2025-player-poll/
