SEATTLE — The recent overhaul of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has raised significant concerns among public health experts about the future of vaccine recommendations in the United States.
Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy’s decision to remove all 17 members of the committee and appoint eight new members, many of whom are known COVID-19 vaccine skeptics, has sparked fears of a chaotic patchwork of vaccine policies across states.
Dr. Helen Chu, a former ACIP member and an expert in infectious diseases from the University of Washington, expressed her concerns during a Thursday morning discussion.
Chu emphasized that ACIP’s role is critical in assessing vaccine safety and effectiveness, as well as determining vaccination needs for specific populations. The committee’s endorsement of vaccines often ensures that they are covered by health insurance plans or funded by the federal government for uninsured individuals.
The new composition of ACIP under Kennedy’s leadership could threaten public trust in its recommendations, according to Chu.
“If we have a system that has been dismantled, one that allowed for open, evidence-based decision making, and that supported transparent dialogue about vaccines, and then we replace it with a process driven largely by one person’s beliefs, it creates a system that cannot be trusted,” Chu stated.
She elaborated on her concerns regarding a potential shift from a national vaccine recommendation model to a fragmented system, wherein different states may adopt varying vaccine policies.
“This could put people, as well as the national public health infrastructure, at risk,” Chu warned. “Thankfully, Washington State is a place where scientists and experts work together, but that may not be the case in every state. That’s going to create a lot of chaos.”
While Chu refrained from commenting directly on the credentials of the new appointees, other experts have expressed apprehension regarding their backgrounds.
Dr. Murray, another vaccine expert, highlighted particular worries over Dr. Robert Malone’s appointment, noting his controversial perspectives during the current measles outbreak and unlikely claims about the COVID-19 vaccine.
Kennedy, during his confirmation hearing, assured Congress that he would not alter the existing vaccine schedule, which includes guidelines for vaccinating infants and young children.
However, Kennedy announced that the newly appointed members would review the current vaccine data in an upcoming meeting scheduled for June.
Chu also pointed out that her own confirmation to ACIP was a lengthy two-year process, which involved a detailed application, an overview of her credentials, and thorough vetting to ensure there were no conflicts of interest.
In contrast, details about the vetting process for the new ACIP members under Kennedy have not been disclosed. The only information provided by Kennedy’s office stated that the new members would ensure that government scientific activities are grounded in credible and impartial scientific evidence.
The lack of transparency about the backgrounds and qualifications of the newly appointed committee members has led to increased skepticism among public health advocates and medical professionals.
As the nation faces ongoing discussions about vaccine safety and effectiveness, the future composition and credibility of ACIP remain critical in shaping public health policy.
image source from：https://www.king5.com/article/news/local/seattle/uw-doctor-inside-perspective-cdc-vaccine-advisory-committee-helen-chu/281-9eb6ed40-a323-4dd9-a712-e690621f5ad0
