California’s Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom has condemned President Donald Trump’s military intervention at protests over federal immigration policy in Los Angeles, branding it an assault on democracy. Newsom’s administration has initiated a lawsuit aimed at thwarting this federal action.
In stark contrast, Texas Republican Governor Greg Abbott has placed the National Guard on standby in anticipation of further demonstrations within his state.
This division in approach underscores the different strategies that the two major political parties are employing as they tackle national politics and the extent of executive power in immigration policy enforcement.
In a live televised address, Newsom articulated his concerns regarding Trump’s actions, emphasizing that they have escalated tensions for political gain.
In a show of solidarity, all 22 other Democratic governors expressed their support for Newsom through a statement from the Democratic Governors Association. They condemned the deployment of the National Guard and threats to send Marines as “an alarming abuse of power” that undermines public trust and signals a lack of faith in local law enforcement by the Trump administration.
Protests in Los Angeles have primarily been confined to a five-block radius in downtown, where nearly 200 individuals were detained, resulting in injuries to at least seven police officers.
Republican governors across the United States have not yet disclosed specific plans regarding troop deployment for protests within their jurisdictions.
Since Trump’s return to the Oval Office, Democratic governors have had to navigate when to openly criticize him, identify opportunities for compromise, and at times, keep their criticisms muted.
Political analysts suggest that the responses from these governors are influenced by various political factors, including potential backlash from the Trump administration against those who take a strong position against him.
Polls indicate that about half of U.S. adults currently approve of Trump’s handling of immigration, although this survey was conducted prior to the recent military intervention.
When engaging with Trump, Democratic governors have varied significantly in their approaches. For example, in February, Maine’s Democratic Governor Janet Mills indicated a willingness to challenge Trump’s proposed funding cuts in court over issues related to transgender athletes’ participation in school sports. Conversely, Michigan’s Governor Gretchen Whitmer, a potential 2028 presidential candidate, has opted for private discussions to find common ground with Trump, moving away from public confrontations.
Hawaii Governor Josh Green initially labeled Trump as a “straight-up dictator” but subsequently decided to adopt a more cautious approach, stating he would refrain from direct criticism.
During a recent House panel hearing focused on sanctuary policies, Democratic governors vocally criticized the Trump administration’s militarization of cities.
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker asserted that his state strictly adheres to immigration laws while also maintaining First Amendment rights. Pritzker stated, “It’s wrong to deploy the National Guard and active duty Marines in an American city over the objection of local law enforcement just as it’s wrong to tear children away from their homes.”
New York’s Governor Kathy Hochul stressed the need for comprehensive immigration reform, stating, “As we speak, an American city has been militarized over the objections of their governor. This is a flagrant abuse of power and nothing short of an assault on our American values.”
In an interview, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro lambasted Trump’s decision to send troops to a planned protest in Philadelphia, accusing him of injecting chaos into various aspects of society, including law and order.
Shapiro, who previously served as state attorney general and has a history of lawsuits against Trump, has generally adopted a more restrained approach since assuming the governorship, although he has criticized Trump’s economic policies.
On the Republican side, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has often found himself at odds with Newsom, who similarly holds national political aspirations. Recently, DeSantis extended an offer to send Florida State Guard troops to assist in California, a proposal Newsom’s office declined, suggesting it would only exacerbate an already chaotic situation perpetuated by the president’s actions.
In a Fox News segment, DeSantis suggested that his offer was intended as a standard expression of mutual aid during a crisis and was critical of the decision to turn it down.
As unrest continues, states are bracing for additional protests over immigration enforcement.
Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont indicated that he has coordinated with local law enforcement to keep the situation manageable, stating, “I don’t want to give the president any pretext to think he can come into Connecticut and militarize the situation. That just makes the situation worse.” Lamont has also voiced apprehension regarding Trump’s eagerness to send federal troops into various states.
In Texas, Governor Abbott directed the deployment of more than 5,000 National Guard troops alongside 2,000 state police officers in preparation for protests. However, city officials in places like Austin and San Antonio clarified that they did not request the National Guard’s involvement, despite troops being present at protests.
DeSantis reiterated that law enforcement teams in Florida are ready to take action against any instances of violence, declaring, “The minute you cross into attacking law enforcement, any type of rioting, any type of vandalism, looting, just be prepared to have the law come down on you, and we will make an example of you, you can guarantee it.”
This situation remains fluid as all parties are closely monitoring developments regarding planned demonstrations and potential military involvement.
image source from：https://whyy.org/articles/governor-shapiro-trump-philadelphia-immigration-protest-national-guard/
