On early Sunday morning, the U.S. launched military operations targeting three sites in Iran, aiming to dismantle the nation’s nuclear capabilities. Following the attack, President Donald Trump announced the development from the White House, characterizing it as a ‘spectacular military success.’ He also issued a warning to Iran regarding any possible retaliation.
The news drew swift reactions from elected officials across Texas, reflecting a range of opinions regarding the military intervention.
Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, emphasized the need for vigilance and national security. He announced measures to elevate the readiness of the Texas Department of Public Safety and the Texas National Guard, stating that Texas stands united with President Trump and is prepared to protect its communities.
‘As we unite as a Nation, we as a state must remain vigilant to secure our homeland,’ he wrote.
Abbott reiterated the importance of safety and community support during this heightened state of alert, assuring Texans that there was no immediate cause for concern.
Republican Attorney General Ken Paxton expressed pride in standing with President Trump, commending the action taken against what he referred to as the ‘murderous Iranian regime.’
‘I’m incredibly grateful for President Trump and the brave men and women in our military defending our great nation,’ he stated.
In stark contrast, U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, a Democrat, criticized Trump’s military decision, calling it unconstitutional and a catalyst for increased anti-American sentiment.
‘With his unconstitutional action entangling us in conflict, he has made American families less safe,’ Doggett argued. He highlighted past U.S. military interventions and their long-term consequences, cautioning that the attacks could provoke further violence.
U.S. Senator John Cornyn, a Republican, praised President Trump’s decision, framing it as a courageous tactic to eliminate potential threats from Iran.
‘President Trump made the courageous and correct decision to eliminate the Iranian nuclear threat. God Bless the USA,’ Cornyn stated, expressing gratitude toward the military’s efforts.
Meanwhile, U.S. Senator Ted Cruz also commended the military operation, labeling it an essential countermeasure against the Iranian regime.
Cruz noted that the Iranian government has sought to acquire nuclear weapons, which he views as a direct threat to both America and its allies. He emphasized that previous negotiations with Iran were unsuccessful, leading to the military strikes.
U.S. Rep. Greg Casar, a Democrat, took a firmer stance against Trump’s actions, calling for Congress to enact a War Powers Resolution to prevent what he deemed an unlawful escalation into war.
Casar emphasized the need for accountability and criticized the long history of misguided military interventions in the Middle East.
In response to the strikes, Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows, a Republican, lauded the military’s successful execution of the mission.
‘Our military executed a precise and successful mission targeting key nuclear sites in Iran — a powerful message that we will never tolerate aggression or terrorism,’ he said, expressing strong support for President Trump and the military’s capabilities.
U.S. Rep. Lizzie Fletcher, a Democrat, condemned the strikes, stating that they violated the Constitution by bypassing Congressional approval.
Fletcher stressed the necessity of maintaining a balance of power, pointing out the potential risks these actions pose for American forces abroad and the potential for escalating hostilities.
Furthermore, U.S. Rep. Sylvia Garcia shared her apprehensions regarding the military action, voicing concerns about the United States becoming ensnared in another prolonged conflict in the Middle East.
Garcia insisted that any decision to go to war requires Congressional consent, urging Trump to consider the implications of his decisions on American families.
On the other hand, Texas Lieutenant Governor Dan Patrick expressed unwavering support for President Trump, describing his actions as a necessary measure to protect the U.S. from threats posed by Iran.
‘President Trump just saved America and the world from fanatical terrorists in Iran. I have never been more proud of my President,’ Patrick stated, underscoring his belief in the president’s leadership in foreign affairs.
U.S. Rep. Michael McCaul, a Republican, echoed sentiments that the military action reinforced the commitment of the U.S. to prevent Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons.
‘Today, President Trump backed that commitment with decisive action — demonstrating the kind of leadership that does what it takes to protect American lives,’ McCaul remarked, indicating that the attack served as a warning to the Iranian regime.
McCaul highlighted that there were no U.S. boots on the ground in Iran, framing the operation as a targeted mission that would foster peace in the region.
Finally, U.S. Rep. Dan Crenshaw joined other Republicans in defending the military strikes, suggesting that the attacks communicated a clear message to Iran regarding its threats against the U.S.
‘You don’t threaten the United States or our allies without consequences,’ Crenshaw asserted. He expressed confidence in President Trump’s approach to foreign policy as advocating peace through strength.
In summary, the military strikes in Iran have drawn a polarizing response from Texas leaders, reflecting the deeply divided opinions on military intervention and the role of the president in matters of war. While some celebrate the action as strong leadership against a potential nuclear threat, others raise alarms about the constitutional implications and the risks of escalation in the region.
image source from：khou
