Wednesday

06-25-2025 Vol 2002

Protests in L.A. Highlight Tensions between Activists and LAPD Response

In June, protests erupted across Los Angeles as demonstrators gathered in significant numbers to voice their opposition to immigration raids and other societal issues, making front-page news throughout the two-week period.

Protesters, in varied group sizes, took to the streets to march against raids conducted by federal immigration enforcement, rallying around the idea of ‘no kings’ in the United States.

These gatherings faced numerous challenges, including a downtown curfew, confrontations with law enforcement, and hostility from the federal government, even in the form of disparaging comments from President Donald Trump.

The Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) became a focal point of criticism as many protesters reported feeling targeted and harmed during the demonstrations.

My colleagues Libor Jany and James Queally detailed in their recent coverage that despite ongoing oversight efforts and promises from leadership to reduce excessive use of force, the LAPD is again under fire for its handling of the protests.

Here are the three main insights from their investigation:

First, numerous protesters expressed to The Times that they perceived the LAPD’s response as excessively violent.

According to accounts shared with reporters, officers issued unclear dispersal commands, quickly escalated situations, and engaged in aggressive actions when protesters were behaving peacefully.

One striking video captured mounted officers nearly trampling an individual who was on the ground.

In another distressing instance reported by a Times journalist, a mounted officer was seen repeatedly striking the roof of a car, demonstrating a concerning level of aggression.

Additionally, a video by civil rights attorney Shakeer Rahman shows an LAPD officer firing non-lethal weapons at close range, underscoring serious concerns about police tactics during the protests.

On June 8, tensions escalated to the point where the LAPD resorted to using tear gas for the first time in decades to control the crowd, further angering demonstrators.

These incidents represent a broader pattern of aggressive law enforcement tactics that many activists, bystanders, and journalists observed and condemned during the protests.

The second takeaway from the coverage is that police officials assert that force was only applied in response to violent actions directed towards officers.

Reports indicate that approximately a dozen officers sustained injuries during confrontations, including serious incidents where a protester allegedly drove a motorcycle into a line of police.

In response to these events, several individuals have been charged with assaulting law enforcement officers, complicating the narrative of the protests.

LAPD officials defended their actions, claiming that officers only retaliated after being attacked with bottles, fireworks, and other objects.

Chief Jim McDonnell has promised a comprehensive review after the events conclude, emphasizing the chaotic environment faced by officers trying to manage a rapidly changing situation.

The third significant point is the underlying tensions that emerged between LAPD leadership and City Hall during the protests.

Sources revealed that communication between police commanders and city officials was strained, with the latter advocating for a more restrained approach amid the burgeoning demonstrations.

Some police officials expressed frustration over being unable to make early arrests, which they believe could have mitigated the chaos before crowds filled downtown Los Angeles.

Despite the mostly peaceful nature of protests, pockets of vandalism occurred as a small minority of demonstrators engaged in destructive behavior.

LAPD authorities highlighted some improvements from past protest responses, such as limitations placed on the use of bean-bag shotguns and increased efforts for quicker processing of arrested individuals.

However, for many observers who have followed LAPD’s history with crowd control, the recent actions during these protests may represent a regression.

The city anticipates facing another series of costly legal battles, adding to the millions it has already paid out over similar protests in the past decade.

As this story develops, other significant issues persist in the city and beyond.

There is heightened concern over recent military actions in the Middle East, specifically regarding Iran.

The U.S. is preparing for potential responses from Iran after American airstrikes targeted nuclear facilities, leading to rising tensions.

One Israeli official noted that Israel would consider halting hostilities if Iran ceased its missile attacks, while former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev suggested that Moscow might provide Iran with nuclear capabilities as a retaliatory measure.

In local news, immigration raids have stirred up fear and tension within communities, with individuals unsure about the roles of various federal agencies like ICE and Border Patrol.

Recent raids highlight anxieties about the impact on local rebuilding efforts, particularly after an ICE raid at a car wash in Bell triggered protests.

In the entertainment sector, Hollywood faced struggles throughout 2024, yet compensation for media executives surged, with notable increases for CEOs in the S&P 500.

One example is Warner Bros. Discovery Chief Executive David Zaslav, whose compensation rose sharply to $51.9 million despite significant company restructuring and layoffs.

Moreover, a troubling trend persists as film and television workers continue to leave Los Angeles in search of better opportunities.

In other incidents, at least six people died when a boat capsized in Lake Tahoe amid a storm, and large sculptures that mysteriously vanished were recovered, but authorities have not made any arrests.

The Los Angeles Unified School District is anticipating a fiscal crisis as it deliberates a budget of $18.8 billion, facing significant financial challenges ahead.

Additionally, a survey indicates that Californians desire ballots to be available in more languages, reflecting the growing cultural diversity in the state.

In a related story, an immigrant father whose three sons have all served in the Marines reported being violently arrested by federal agents, raising concerns about the treatment of individuals within immigrant families.

Six teenagers were shot at a party in Moreno Valley last Saturday, with five suffering life-threatening injuries, according to Riverside County officials.

Lastly, a San Fernando music shop with historical significance featured in the 1992 film ‘Wayne’s World’ has closed after nearly 78 years of operation.

On the sports front, Oklahoma City emerged victorious in Game 7 of the NBA finals, claiming their second title in franchise history.

In entertainment, this morning’s must-reads also feature discussions on the evolving landscape of Hollywood, with an awards columnist sharing his Emmy ballot and insights on possible dream nominees.

Columnist Mark Z. Barabak reflects on Governor Newsom’s stance against former President Trump, questioning if such actions characterize presidential potential.

Additionally, columnists raise awareness of pressing state budget concerns, including issues related to crime, Medi-Cal, and the Delta tunnel project.

As we move forward, many shall reflect upon these developments in our rapidly changing city and on the national stage.

Have a great day, from the Essential California team.

image source from:latimes

Abigail Harper