Los Angeles is facing numerous pressing issues that require innovative solutions. One potential approach to bolster community engagement and tackle complicated challenges is the introduction of civic assemblies. These assemblies offer a platform for ordinary residents to partake actively in decision-making processing, addressing critical issues such as homelessness, wildfire recovery, and police-community relations.
In recent times, cities around the globe have turned to civic assemblies as a means to solve communal problems in an inclusive manner. While primarily adopted in European cities, Brazil, Colombia, Canada, and a few locations across the United States, they have yet to gain significant traction in Los Angeles. Despite this, various groups in the city are striving to bring the concept to life.
A civic assembly is essentially a blend of city council meetings and jury duty, where randomly selected residents, chosen for their diversity concerning demographics, gather to discuss pivotal questions facing their community. The idea is to create a representative group, allowing citizens to learn, deliberate, and ultimately provide policy recommendations that can be translated into legislation.
In cities that have adopted civic assemblies, they have been a means of addressing challenging or divisive topics. For instance, places like Brussels and Paris have developed permanent civic assembly frameworks, convening them annually to seek input on pressing issues. In contrast, existing structures in Southern California, such as school site councils and citizen’s advisory groups, often see members handpicked by elected officials. This discrepancy highlights the unique accessibility and representativeness of civic assemblies.
Participants in civic assemblies receive stipends to cover transportation, childcare, and meal expenses, ensuring that a broad segment of the population can partake. This inclusive selection process is what has caught the eye of various local leaders, including Culver City Councilmember Bubba Fish. His interest stems from a desire to hear from a wider range of residents, particularly those who may be disengaged from conventional civic life.
Recently, a mock civic assembly took place at the Veterans Memorial Building in Culver City, aimed at giving Los Angeles residents a taste of how such assemblies operate. Organized by Public Democracy L.A. alongside Braver Angels, the event attracted around 30 diverse participants eager to engage in meaningful dialogue.
Joan Jaeckel, a resident from Studio City, expressed her enthusiasm about the civic assembly, seeing it as a refreshing alternative to contentious political debates often encountered online. She emphasized the thrill of collaborating with others in a constructive environment focused on curiosity and learning.
The assembly embarked on a significant query that day: “What should happen to land in areas damaged by fire to balance resiliency, safety, and housing needs?” Participants quickly encountered the complexity of this issue, deepening their understanding of fire resilience, municipal finance, and housing policy as experts from various organizations shared their insights.
During the session, participants split into smaller groups, each directed to explore an individual policy proposal. Ideas floated ranged from low-interest loans for rebuilding projects in affected fire zones to suggestions for creating forested buffer zones around residential neighborhoods, and ensuring that all new construction in burn areas practices sustainability by being gas-free.
Facilitators guided discussions, urging participants to critically assess the advantages and disadvantages of each proposal. They probed logistical, financial, and social implications while also addressing questions around the potential impact on developers or local communities. Each group contributed thoughtfully to the refinement of proposals, adjusting the language to better reflect their aims.
The collaborative spirit of the assembly was palpable, characterized by participants seeking understanding rather than engaging in heated debates. This thoughtful dialogue created a space for exploring a range of opinions and frames of reference, as participants considered the complexities underlying potential solutions.
As the day progressed, participants expressed their support through a voting process, placing colored dots on proposals that resonated with them. This final exercise mirrored the approval system of a genuine civic assembly, where the most supported ideas are advanced for official consideration.
The implications of such civic assemblies can be significant, as evidenced by successful legislation resulting from similar initiatives in other countries. For instance, Ireland’s civic assemblies played a vital role in advancing monumental social changes, including the repeal of an abortion ban and the legalization of same-sex marriage.
However, the transition from assembly to legislation isn’t always seamless; outcomes can vary. In France, for instance, only a fraction of proposals from a civic assembly on climate policy saw successful implementation, highlighting the challenges these assemblies can face in influencing government action.
Despite the mixed results regarding direct legislative outcomes, studies show that participants in civic assemblies often walk away feeling more connected to their communities and politically engaged. In a recent assembly in Petaluma, 90% of participants reported feeling a greater sense of community and believed their input held value in local governance.
Feedback from participants in the mock assembly echoed this sentiment. Patrick Traynor, an attendee from Irvine, shared his surprise at the depth of the discussions and highlighted how the process facilitated learning about complex topics in a cooperative environment.
Similarly, Jamal Thomas from Bell Gardens expressed that listening to diverse perspectives cultivated a sense of hope for reaching feasible solutions. These individual experiences collectively reflect the potential transformative power civic assemblies can have on community dynamics and political participation.
As Culver City considers adopting civic assemblies as a tool for improved decision-making—especially regarding public budgeting—the future looks promising for greater community engagement in Los Angeles. As local governments increasingly recognize the benefits of inclusive dialogue, residents and advocates are hopeful that civic assemblies could become a more commonplace component of civic life in L.A.
The discourse on civic assemblies continues to evolve, with organizations like Public Democracy L.A. championing the concept to inspire further experimentation and adoption in the city. Ultimately, the aim is to create mechanisms through which residents feel empowered to collaboratively address community challenges and actively contribute to shaping their environment.
A Culver City governance subcommittee is set to meet soon to discuss the potential for implementing a civic assembly focused on redesigning the budget process. Residents wishing to share their thoughts on civic assemblies will have an opportunity to voice their opinions during the meeting, reflecting a growing movement towards participatory governance in Los Angeles.
image source from：laist
