As Los Angeles approaches the opportunity to host the 2028 Olympic Games, voices of dissent have emerged calling for the city to withdraw from its commitment.
However, abandoning the Olympics would be a misguided decision.
Much of the recent negativity surrounding the LA28 Games has been fueled by a meeting between LA28 Chairman Casey Wasserman and President Donald Trump in Washington.
Wasserman has faced backlash on social media, criticized as a “suck-up” and a “kiss-ass” for his behavior during the meeting.
Yet, labeling Wasserman in such derogatory terms is not justified.
He approached the meeting with professionalism and purpose, rising above the pervasive political noise that often clouds discussions today.
Wasserman’s obligation was clear: he had to navigate the ceremony with grace, maintain his composure, and represent the city he has called home for his entire life.
His actions were not about aligning with any political figure, but rather about ensuring the best outcome for Los Angeles and its residents.
The history of Los Angeles and the Olympic Games is rich and marked by two successful previous events in 1932 and 1984, showcasing the city’s unique ability to host the Olympics effectively.
Wasserman is part of a legendary trio of Olympic executives who have made significant contributions to the city’s Olympic legacy, each facing their own sets of challenges during their respective tenures.
William May Garland played an instrumental role in securing the 1928 Olympics for Los Angeles, overcoming skepticism about the city’s viability.
Four years later, the presence of a new Memorial Coliseum and the groundbreaking Olympic Village transformed perceptions, making Los Angeles a household name in international sports.
In 1984, Peter Ueberroth took the helm amidst Cold War tensions and the threat of a Soviet boycott.
Despite these obstacles, Ueberroth adeptly managed commercial interests, resulting in a remarkable profit that still benefits the community today through the LA84 Foundation.
The historical significance and local pride tied to the Olympic Games in Los Angeles cannot be overlooked.
When Los Angeles hosted the Olympics, it wasn’t just about the event itself, but about joy, celebration, and the achievements of athletes who brought the global community together.
Wasserman’s interactions with President Trump should be viewed through the lens of strategic diplomacy rather than political allegiance.
His willingness to engage with Trump at this juncture is a reflection of his dedication to ensuring the Games proceed smoothly, rather than an endorsement of any political agenda.
Viewing Wasserman’s actions as “selling out” misses the larger picture of what these games represent not only for Los Angeles but also for the athletes and the world.
The call for Los Angeles to withdraw from hosting is premature and rooted more in personal political feelings than in practical considerations for the city and its residents.
Angelenos should focus on the potential for joy, economic opportunities, and global unity that the Olympic Games can foster, instead of succumbing to knee-jerk reactions based on political affiliations.
With three more years leading up to the Olympics, Wasserman and his team have the opportunity to cultivate an event that can once again place Los Angeles in the spotlight for positive reasons.
For now, it’s essential for the city to remain steadfast in its commitment to host the Games, emphasizing the values of sport, unity, and resilience that transcend the current political climate.
The narrative surrounding the LA28 Olympics should continue to center on the athletes and the spirit of competition that bring nations together, rather than detracting from it by fixating on political affiliations.
Ultimately, as we approach the 2028 Olympics, Los Angeles should embrace the challenge ahead and build on its storied Olympic history, turning the page on political grievances and preparing for a thrilling display of athletic achievement.
image source from：latimes
