In recent statements, U.S. Commerce Secretary Harold Lutnick declared that tariffs on Canada are here to stay, indicating a significant transformation in U.S. trade policy under President Donald Trump’s administration. While Lutnick characterized the notion of free trade as not dead, analysts argue that recent actions reflect a departure from long-standing free trade principles.
The U.S. trade policy has indeed experienced a drastic shift over the past six months. Traditionally, the country has adhered to a free trade framework for more than 40 years, promoting global trade and successfully reducing tariffs on goods across the world. This approach has contributed to substantial economic growth internationally.
However, the current administration appears to be reversing these free trade gains, opting instead for a managed trade system that is primarily characterized by the imposition of broad and specific tariffs. Examples of such tariffs include those on steel and aluminum, as well as automobiles, with steel tariffs reaching up to 50 percent and automobile tariffs set at 25 percent. New copper tariffs are also scheduled to take effect on August 4, 2025, further complicating trade relations.
Although these tariffs are generalized, their impact is not equitable, with certain countries—especially Canada—bearing the brunt of these measures. The overarching aim seems to be to repatriate primary industries to the U.S., demonstrating a preference for managed trade rather than open markets.
The Trump administration’s stance is largely rooted in a belief that free trade enables other nations to exploit U.S. economic advantages. As part of this protectionist approach, the administration has threatened to elevate tariffs across virtually all trading partners, engaging in negotiations that may link foreign purchases to potential tariff reductions.
A notable illustration of such negotiations involves the U.S. and Bangladesh. To mitigate the impending 35 percent tariff burden, Bangladesh has entered into a memorandum of understanding to purchase annual wheat imports from the U.S. totaling 700,000 tonnes over the next five years. This arrangement is significant considering Bangladesh’s annual wheat imports range between five to seven million tonnes, predominantly sourced from the Black Sea region.
Historically, Canada has been a key supplier of high-quality wheat to Bangladesh, averaging around 1.2 million tonnes in exports over the past decade. It is evident that the U.S. is leveraging its tariff strategy to create trade dependencies that threaten Canadian agricultural exports.
While the situation between the U.S. and Canada exemplifies challenges posed by tariff strategies, the ripple effects of U.S. trade policy may extend further, particularly impacting Canadian farmers. The competition faced from highly subsidized U.S. agricultural commodities, including wheat, corn, and soybeans, poses an increasing threat that demands close monitoring.
As trade agreements are finalized in the coming months, it remains crucial to observe the implications of these negotiations and tariff arrangements on the broader North American agricultural landscape. This situation encapsulates a critical moment in global trade dynamics, with potential long-term consequences for Canadian exports and agricultural interests.
image source from：producer
