The proposed redevelopment of Philip Johnson’s iconic Comerica Bank Tower in downtown Dallas has sparked significant concern among architecture critics and urban planners alike.
Designed by the esteemed architect Philip Johnson, the 60-story tower has served as a notable component of the Dallas skyline.
The new plan, developed by Slate Asset Management and Stream Realty Partners with design contributions from HKS, aims to convert the building into a mixed-use space that would include hotel accommodations, residential units, and retail options.
A shift from a purely commercial office building is welcomed, especially in light of the city’s post-COVID challenges, including an oversupply of office space and a pressing need for housing.
However, the means by which this transformation is proposed has left many, including Johnson’s biographer, aghast.
The crucial issue is the proposed replacement of the building’s landscaped plaza and banking hall with a stark, 437-space parking garage.
This garage, which presents a blank facade to Ervay Street, is intended to be topped by an event space described as a ‘jewel box,’ but critics argue it ultimately detracts from the vibrant street life the developers claim to desire.
During a recent presentation to the city’s Urban Design Peer Review Panel, developers assured that their design would foster a ‘walkable environment.’
Contrary to these claims, the plan would produce a pedestrian experience characterized by a narrow 6.5-foot-wide sidewalk adjacent to a monolithic parking structure.
This creates a shadowy, lifeless atmosphere rather than the bustling urban setting one might hope for.
Moreover, the new garage would stand looming across from the historic Wilson Building, overshadowing its architectural significance with not only a dull metallic exterior but also an intrusive line of LED lights, which has been criticized as light pollution.
In discussing the architectural context, it’s important to note that the Comerica Bank Tower, originally completed in 1987, has undergone various transformations throughout its history.
Once known as Momentum Place, it was commissioned by MBank, a significant player in the Texas banking sector of its time.
Johnson’s design originally featured a crenelated roofline, a nod to medieval architecture, but this was ultimately replaced with the distinctive crossed barrel vaults that define the tower today.
While the tower may not be universally loved, it serves as a monument to the corporate culture of the 1980s, encapsulating the excesses of that era within its lavish materials and architectural gestures.
The impressive banking hall, featuring a stunning six-story arcade and opulent fixtures, encapsulates this corporate ethos wonderfully.
It is here, within this richly adorned space, that the character of the building is most vividly expressed.
Losing such an integral part of the building’s identity to a parking garage raises alarm for many who appreciate architecture’s role in cultural memory.
Facing potential criticism, suggestions have emerged for alternative adaptations of Johnson’s original design, which could include a reimagined mall or food court concept.
Supporters of preservation point to an existing three-story underground garage with ample parking, arguing that further excavation below could alleviate the need for additional above-ground parking.
The Urban Design Peer Review Panel has also weighed in, suggesting various alternatives to enhance the project’s urban integration.
Among their recommendations, they emphasized the importance of creating more street-level vibrancy and ensuring pedestrian safety around the building’s perimeter.
Their skepticism about the proposed automotive drop-off that would replace existing pedestrian spaces indicates a need for careful consideration of urban pedestrian dynamics.
Despite the panel’s insightful suggestions, they lack the power to enforce changes, as their role is purely advisory.
City staff rely on these recommendations when reviewing projects that seek financial assistance or planning approval.
Brendan Shanahan, a managing director at Slate Asset Management, recently stated that they are actively working through the redevelopment processes to transform the Comerica Bank Tower into a mixed-use destination.
He mentioned that the design presented would evolve further as they engaged with public stakeholders.
However, the vague nature of these assurances raises concerns about the true extent of thoughtful engagement in this redevelopment initiative.
Until a markedly improved plan is presented by the developers, any proposed alterations to this architectural landmark should be viewed with skepticism.
The preservation of Johnson’s work is not merely about aesthetics; it’s about maintaining a piece of urban history that reflects a specific moment in Dallas’s economic and social development.
image source from：dallasnews
