Residents of Staten Island are once again facing the prospect of subsidizing a project that will offer little to no direct benefit to them.
Recent discussions have highlighted that National Grid plans to increase utility bills for customers in Staten Island, along with those in the other four boroughs and Long Island, by approximately 3.5%.
This increase is intended to help finance the $1 billion Northeast Supply Enhancement pipeline project, which primarily serves to deliver natural gas to residents of Brooklyn, Queens, and Nassau County.
Despite promises from National Grid that the enhanced supply will eventually benefit Staten Island customers, many locals remain skeptical about the assurances being provided.
Moreover, there are serious concerns over the environmental implications of the proposed pipeline.
Planned to run along the southern and eastern shores of Staten Island, the pipeline could potentially pose risks to local ecosystems, as well as negatively impacting boating and various recreational activities cherished by the community.
The feeling of being overlooked is not new for Staten Islanders, who often find themselves making sacrifices for the perceived benefit of their neighbors in other boroughs.
Consider the congestion pricing initiative, which has been touted for reducing traffic congestion in Manhattan.
However, the implementation of this program has led to an uptick in truck traffic on Staten Island’s roads, escalating pollution levels as a consequence.
This issue is particularly evident on the Staten Island Expressway, a roadway already struggling against the burden of high traffic volumes.
Despite the adverse effects on local residents, many Staten Islanders feel a sense of obligation to support initiatives that are framed as benefits for their neighbors.
Another point of contention is the billions anticipated to flow into the city’s subway system from congestion pricing.
Although Staten Islanders do rely on the subway, they still lack a direct connection, a promise made over a century ago that remains unfulfilled.
Adding to the growing list of concerns are the numerous battery energy storage system (BESS) facilities currently being constructed throughout Staten Island.
These installations are rising especially in residential areas, which raises questions about the appropriateness of placing such industrial facilities in neighborhoods.
Moreover, the safety of BESS sites remains unproven, particularly since fires at these facilities can be difficult to extinguish, thus endangering local communities and emergency service personnel.
The rationale behind placing these risks on Staten Island stems from a broader need for increased electrical capacity across the state, yet this justification does little to alleviate community fears.
Over the years, Staten Islanders have repeatedly been asked to bear the burdens of citywide decisions.
For decades, toll revenues collected from the Verrazzano-Narrows Bridge have been funneled into expanding services for the Long Island Rail Road and Metro-North, transit options that are seldom utilized by Staten Islanders on a daily basis.
Additionally, Staten Island served as the location for what was once New York City’s only municipal landfill.
The Fresh Kills landfill received up to 29 tons of refuse daily from other boroughs, operating for over fifty years and exceeding environmental regulations during its time.
Even as officials promised that the landfill would be temporary when it opened in 1948, it took legal actions from Staten Island representatives to achieve its closure in 2001, underscoring a long history of environmental injustice faced by the community.
The community’s frustrations have grown as residents now find themselves confronted with the prospect of funding a pipeline that will not directly benefit them.
A public comment period regarding the pipeline project has been extended until August 15, providing residents an opportunity to challenge this initiative.
Staten Islanders are urged to raise their voices against the project and express their discontent over being expected to shoulder additional financial burdens without tangible benefits.
As the public comment period approaches, it is crucial for the community to stand united and assert their demands for fairness and equitable treatment.
image source from：silive
