As temperatures in D.C. soared into triple-digit heat indices this summer, Pepco faced scrutiny for suggesting residents simply reduce their air conditioner usage to save on energy bills.
Pepco spokesperson Chuck McDade likened the sound of HVAC units kicking on to a ‘cha-ching’ sign, indicating rising costs for customers.
However, an investigation revealed that Pepco had already benefitted significantly from a rate hike in 2019, collecting $108 million from D.C. customers without fully utilizing those funds.
In 2023, Pepco approached the Public Service Commission (PSC) again to request an additional rate increase for 2024 to 2026, which would amount to $190.7 million.
The PSC initially rejected this extensive request but later approved a limited increase for 2025-2026, which is estimated to add about $11 per month to household bills and yield $123.4 million for the utility.
Commissioner Richard Beverly, the lone dissenting voice on the commission, called the decision a ‘regulatory trainwreck’ that favored Pepco over ratepayers.
He criticized the justification for the increase as vague and dismissive, summarizing it as ‘because Pepco said so.’
This ill-fated decision came alongside reports that Pepco’s revenue had exceeded $27.6 million in May and $33.6 million in June.
Utility bills rose about 17.7% starting in June, attributed to increased energy supply costs from PJM Interconnection, a company that supplies Pepco.
As residents struggled with rising costs, Pepco issued over 31,000 disconnection warnings during the sweltering months, resulting in 2,464 power shutoffs.
While the utility company looks to implement the newly approved rate increases, the Office of the People’s Counsel has stepped in with a lawsuit against Pepco.
This legal challenge accuses Pepco of misusing at least $94 million and argues that the approved increases will not adequately protect customers from unreasonable rates.
People’s Counsel Sandra Mattavous-Frye noted that the lawsuit’s outcome might have long-term implications on how utility rate hikes are evaluated in D.C.
The lawsuit particularly critiques Pepco’s multiyear rate plan, which allows for preapproved hikes based on predicted costs instead of actual spending.
This new model, previously tested on a trial basis, has raised concerns about its effectiveness without prior evaluations.
Courtney Lane, an analyst from Synapse Energy Economics, has voiced concerns that the PSC’s approval of the rate increases did not incentivize Pepco to keep costs down or to protect customers.
Instead, she suggested that the rate hikes masked traditional infrastructure projects that should not require further justification through increased rates.
Though Pepco aimed to raise funds for infrastructure improvements, the consulting firm’s analysis indicated that Pepco actually spent $94 million less than anticipated, raising suspicions of profit over transparency.
Beverly and others have demanded accountability for this alleged mismanagement of funds, comparing it to a child pocketing money intended for lunch.
Despite Pepco’s claims of enhanced reliability due to past investments, critics remain skeptical of its transparency in disclosing specific projects needing funding from the next rate hike.
The PSC ultimately approved a rate hike for 2025-2026, predicting an 11% increase in bills.
Additionally, a 5% delivery rate hike applied earlier this year saw average household bills rise from around $95 to $114.
With the June supply charge also on the rise, the average summer bill for 2025 reached approximately $135.
Residents will face another rate increase in January 2026, predicted to add another $3.80 to their monthly expenses.
Pepco defends the multiyear plan as essential for meeting customer energy needs and maintaining grid reliability, describing the ratemaking process as highly regulated.
Meanwhile, the Office of the People’s Counsel insists that Pepco needs to be held accountable for the funds it has already received and that a lack of oversight may allow for continued complacency.
As the OPC lawsuit proceeds, residents struggle under the weight of escalating utility bills during a season where air conditioning becomes a critical necessity.
Recent data indicates that D.C. has witnessed over 376 heat-related emergency responses since May, underscoring the life-threatening conditions exacerbated by soaring temperatures.
Advocates warn that with increasing utility costs, more residents may be pushed into precarious situations, especially those already vulnerable due to rising unemployment rates and federal job cuts.
The District’s utility payment assistance programs have faced challenges as federal funds diminished in March, leaving many residents without support.
Research indicates that households spending over 6% of their income on energy bills face an ‘unaffordable’ energy burden, with those exceeding 10% categorized as experiencing a ‘severe’ burden.
In D.C., households qualifying for food stamps reportedly spend over 20% of their income on energy bills, more than double the threshold for severe challenges.
Though Pepco administers a $2.5 million Customer Relief Fund, the soaring energy costs and annual bill increases further complicate the landscape for residents who are already struggling.
We Power DC representative Harrison Pyros pointed out that more than half of the clients receiving assistance still fall behind on their bills, exacerbating the crisis.
Comparing data from last year, disconnection rates have significantly increased, with almost double the shutoffs occurring this May and June compared to the same months in the previous year.
Ward 1 Councilmember Brianne Nadeau has proposed legislation to prevent electricity shutoffs during both summer and winter months, though the bill has yet to pass through committee review.
In conclusion, D.C. residents facing escalating electrical bills due to Pepco’s fluctuating pricing must navigate increasing energy costs with limited support from existing relief programs.
With the ongoing lawsuit against Pepco and the city’s uncertain regulatory landscape, the potential for further modifications in how utilities handle rate increases hangs in the balance.
Residents are encouraged to reach out to Pepco or access OPC’s resources for assistance with their energy bills and to learn about contesting charges on their accounts.
image source from：washingtoncitypaper
