NEW YORK (AP) — During a recent summit in Alaska, President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin reached a significant agreement concerning Ukraine, which could alter the dynamics of the ongoing conflict that has persisted for over three years.
U.S. special envoy Steve Witkoff revealed that Putin consented to the United States and its European allies providing Ukraine with security guarantees reminiscent of NATO’s Article 5 collective defense mandate as part of a broader peace agreement.
Witkoff remarked during his appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union” that this concession was a historic first, indicating that the Russian leadership expressed agreement to a form of defense protection for Ukraine, a key element of its aspirations for NATO membership.
Article 5 stipulates that an armed attack against one NATO member is perceived as an attack against all, signaling a united front among member nations.
He noted that this shift in stance by Putin could potentially pave the way for Ukraine’s security assurances without necessitating full NATO membership, which Russia has always opposed.
Further insights from the talks indicate that Russia also committed to enacting a legal framework to ensure it would refrain from aggression towards other European nations, thus aiming to stabilize regional security.
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen communicated her approval of this development during a press conference held in Brussels, alongside Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
She expressed appreciation for President Trump’s readiness to extend Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine and emphasized the European Union’s commitment to contribute to such arrangements.
Zelenskyy acknowledged the positive signals emanating from Washington regarding these security guarantees but voiced concerns about the lack of clarity on their implementation, specifically regarding the roles of America, Europe, and the EU in this framework.
He underscored that the essential priority would be for these security guarantees to function effectively, similar to NATO’s Article 5, while stating that Ukraine views its EU accession as a critical aspect of these security assurances.
Witkoff defended the decision by President Trump to shift focus from demanding an immediate ceasefire from Russia, a prerequisite set ahead of the meeting, to seeking a potential peace deal.
He claimed that substantial progress was made on various issues pertinent to a peace agreement, though specific details were scarce.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who accompanied Witkoff during the discussions, commented on the challenges ahead, clarifying that no truce had been established as Ukraine was not present at the summit.
Rubio remarked on the potential consequences if a peace agreement fails, reiterating the president’s commitment to addressing these issues, but with the insight that no simple solutions exist.
In an interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press,” Rubio expressed skepticism that imposing new sanctions would lead to a ceasefire, warning that such measures could diminish U.S. leverage in negotiations.
While acknowledging that not all issues have been resolved, Rubio highlighted that some areas for potential agreement were identified, though significant disagreements persist, indicating that the path forward remains challenging.
Following the summit, Zelenskyy and European leaders are scheduled to meet with Trump at the White House to further discuss security arrangements.
Witkoff expressed optimism about the progress made, suggesting that even if the gap remains for a complete peace deal, steps have been taken towards resolution.
He also emphasized the need for a ‘land swap’ discussion that could ultimately fall under Ukrainian control, a matter that was not addressed in detail during the talks with Putin.
The intention going forward is to foster clarity and expediency that might lead to a comprehensive peace agreement soon.
This emerging framework of security guarantees for Ukraine represents a potential pivot point in international relations concerning Eastern Europe, with implications for NATO, Russian diplomacy, and the broader geopolitical landscape.
image source from：pbs
