South Korea’s Industry Minister has announced plans to closely examine the terms of a recent U.S.-Japan trade deal. This comes as the nation prepares for critical trade talks in Washington, signaling a potential increase in cooperation between South Korea and the U.S. in sectors such as energy and industry.
The context of the announcement holds particular significance, given the competitive landscape shared by Japan and South Korea in industries like automobiles and steel. The recent trade agreement between Japan and the U.S. has set a benchmark that South Korea now feels pressured to meet. Specifically, South Korea is facing an August 1 deadline to negotiate a deal that achieves terms equal to or better than the Japan-U.S. agreement, in order to avoid reciprocal tariffs of 25% imposed by the U.S.
Analyst Kim Sung-rae from Hanwha Investment & Securities emphasized that the Japan-U.S. deal has put additional pressure on Korean negotiators. He stated that investors are viewing the deal as a critical standard for South Korea’s negotiations with the U.S.
On Wednesday, South Korea’s benchmark KOSPI index saw a modest rise of 0.2%, while shares in local automotive manufacturers experienced notable gains. Hyundai Motor’s stock surged by 7.3%, and Kia’s shares jumped 7.6% following positive market reactions to the Japan-U.S. trade deal.
As the key representatives from South Korea prepare for high-level discussions with U.S. officials in Washington, Industry Minister Kim Jung-kwan expressed that the country aims to avoid being at a comparative disadvantage in its trade agreements. He noted that South Korea would find it challenging to agree to terms that significantly differ from those established by Japan.
Trade professor Kim Yang-hee from Daegu University spoke on this issue, predicting that South Korea is likely to arrive at a similar agreement with the U.S., while management professor Kim Yong-jin from Sogang University outlined potential hurdles. He remarked that achieving U.S. tariff rates lower than those agreed upon by Japan and Britain may prove difficult.
Furthermore, South Korea’s negotiators recognize the need to align their import strategies to mirror Japan’s success in achieving favorable trade terms. There are indications that South Korea may have to open up its agricultural markets further, a move suggested by the nation’s top trade envoy.
However, South Korea has made it clear that it will not use the opening of its rice and beef markets as leverage in discussions. The focus remains on increasing U.S. imports of agricultural goods, particularly those that can be used as fuel, such as corn for bioethanol. This strategy was highlighted by statements from the Industry Minister, indicating a commitment to enhancing Korea-U.S. industrial cooperation.
The anticipated economic implications of these discussions have prompted South Korea to approach the negotiations with caution. Minister Kim Jung-kwan mentioned the importance of considering the sensitivities of South Korea’s industry throughout the process.
In the backdrop of these developments, President Donald Trump highlighted the benefits of the Japan-U.S. deal on social media. He reiterated Japan’s commitment to improving market access for American producers across various sectors, including automobiles and agriculture.
Under the terms of the trade agreement, the tariff on Japanese imports has been reduced from 25% to 15%. This deal also incorporates significant investments from Japan into the U.S. economy, amounting to $550 billion. Trump further assured that Japan would not face disadvantages regarding industry-specific tariffs linked to sectors such as chips and pharmaceuticals.
Interestingly, reports have emerged indicating that the U.S. has encouraged South Korea to establish a large investment fund aimed at revitalizing its manufacturing sector. This initiative has reportedly been discussed in recent negotiations, although details remain vague.
In addition, the cooperation between the U.S. and South Korea appears to be expanding into the areas of chips and shipbuilding, among others, suggesting a broadening of economic ties. As discussions progress, there is also speculation regarding the potential for joint ventures in energy projects, such as the $44 billion LNG initiative in Alaska, which South Korea has shown interest in. However, feasibility concerns have been voiced by South Korea’s trade envoy, leading to uncertainty around the project’s prospects as talks continue.
image source from：agriculture
