In a significant maneuver, three states have announced the deployment of hundreds of their National Guard members to Washington, D.C., as part of President Donald Trump’s initiative aimed at reforming policing in the capital through federal measures addressing crime and homelessness.
West Virginia is set to send between 300 to 400 troops, South Carolina has pledged 200, and Ohio will contribute 150 personnel in the coming days.
These developments, which were revealed on Saturday, arrive during a time of heightened tensions as demonstrators have been vocally opposing the federal law enforcement presence and National Guard mobilization across the predominantly Democratic city.
This latest action comes on the heels of President Trump’s executive order that federalized local police forces and activated around 800 members from the District of Columbia National Guard.
By bringing in additional troops from other states, President Trump is asserting greater control over D.C., which he justifies as a necessary response to rising crime and homelessness in the city.
However, local officials have pointed out that violent crime rates in Washington are actually lower than during Trump’s first term, raising questions about the rationale for deploying more forces.
The National Guard’s current role in D.C. has largely been limited to patrolling key locations such as the National Mall and Union Station, as well as assisting with managing crowds.
The announcement of increased troop deployments has led to widespread protests, with dozens gathering in Dupont Circle on Saturday before marching toward the White House—a distance of approximately 1.5 miles.
Protesters carried banners reading “No fascist takeover of D.C.” and signs that proclaimed “No military occupation,” signaling their opposition to what they perceive as an overreach by the Trump administration.
Morgan Taylor, one of the protest organizers, expressed hope that public outcry would force the administration to reconsider its aggressive crime and immigration policies.
“It’s hot, but I’m glad to be here. It’s good to see all these people out here,” Taylor remarked.
She highlighted her disbelief that such a situation was unfolding in the country at this time.
Feeding the discontent at the protests was a growing anxiety about the overreach of presidential power and concerns that Trump was using crime as a pretext for imposing his will on Washington.
John Finnigan, a 55-year-old resident and real estate construction manager, expressed incredulity over the situation, noting that crime was declining.
“It’s ridiculous,” Finnigan stated, urging local mayors and residents to take a proactive stance to prevent similar actions in their own cities.
Jamie Dickstein, a 24-year-old teacher, voiced her discomfort with the presence of “unmarked officers of all types” who were now operating in Washington and detaining individuals.
Dickstein joined the protest along with friends and relatives, motivated by a desire to prevent a ripple effect that could set a precedent for other cities facing similar situations.
West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrisey, a Republican, confirmed the deployment of Guard troops, stating that they stand “ready to support our partners in the National Capital Region.”
“This is an important undertaking,” he affirmed, emphasizing his state’s commitment to President Trump’s initiative to restore pride and beauty to the nation’s capital.
The involvement of additional National Guard personnel indicates that the administration perceives a need for an increased law enforcement presence, despite President Trump’s earlier downplaying of the necessity for D.C. to hire more police officers.
Maj. Gen. James Seward, West Virginia’s adjutant general, echoed this sentiment in a statement, asserting that the unique capabilities of the National Guard make them invaluable in this mission.
The arrival of federal agents in some of the district’s busiest areas has sparked mixed reactions from residents and leaders alike, ranging from applause to alarm.
City officials, who are obliged to comply with Trump’s directives due to federal laws governing local governance in D.C., have expressed their desire to cooperate while simultaneously pushing back against the broad scope of the president’s intervention.
Following a recent lawsuit launched by the district’s top attorney, the administration also reversed a controversial order to appoint the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration as an “emergency police commissioner.”
Additionally, Trump’s attorney general, Pam Bondi, issued a memo instructing the Metropolitan Police Department to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement, regardless of local laws.
Local officials are currently assessing the best strategies to comply with the federal requests while maintaining their own governance standards.
In a declaration of an emergency, Trump cited the “city government’s failure to maintain public order,” asserting that this had obstructed the federal government’s capacity to function effectively.
A letter addressed to D.C. residents from Mayor Muriel Bowser articulated her concerns about the unprecedented challenges facing the city’s self-governance.
“Our limited self-government has never faced the type of test we are facing right now,” she wrote, urging residents to unite in their efforts to uphold American democracy, even in the face of significant challenges.
image source from：abcnews
