US President Donald Trump has announced a highly anticipated meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin scheduled for August 15 in Alaska. This meeting marks the first face-to-face interaction between the leaders since before Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, raising significant concern and interest among international observers.
As discussions progress, an important aspect of the context surrounding this summit is Russia’s recent proposal for a cease-fire. This proposal reportedly includes substantial territorial concessions in eastern Ukraine, which could see significant portions of the Donbas region ceded to Russia.
To provide insight into the implications of this upcoming meeting and the proposed cease-fire, experts from the Atlantic Council have weighed in on the evolving situation.
John E. Herbst, senior director at the Eurasia Center and a former US ambassador to Ukraine, noted that Trump has been increasing pressure on the Kremlin over the past two months. This strategy has involved persuading NATO allies to boost their defense spending, introducing threats of new sanctions against Russia, and addressing the rising tariffs on countries like India that purchase Russian oil.
Despite these pressures, there are indications that Trump continues to view Putin as a potential partner rather than an adversary. “In spite of his recent criticism of Putin, Trump seems to still be clinging to the idea that he can talk with Putin as a partner rather than as an adversary,” remarked Oleh Shamshur, a former Ukrainian ambassador to the United States and a nonresident senior fellow at the Eurasia Center.
Looking ahead to the meeting, Tressa Guenov, director for programs and operations at the Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security, pointed out that Putin approaches this summit with a sense of domestic confidence. She highlighted that the international isolation Russia has faced since the onset of the Ukraine war could be perceived as a protective barrier against actions from the US and Europe.
A significant concern regarding the proposed cease-fire is that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy will not be present during the negotiations. Shamshur expressed that crucial issues for Ukraine are being deliberated without its direct involvement, echoing sentiments from historical events where territories were discussed behind the backs of the affected nations, much like the Yalta Conference of 1945.
Putin’s strategy appears to focus on establishing a deal with Trump that he intends to present to Kyiv and European capitals as a fait accompli. Herbst believes this approach could hinder the pursuit of a lasting peace in the region.
The reported cease-fire terms suggest a possibly advantageous immediate outcome for Moscow, but crucial elements affecting the ongoing conflict have been deferred for future negotiations. Concerns include Russia’s response to the continued military support for Ukraine from the United States and NATO allies, alongside the potential deployment of European peacekeepers in Ukraine. Guenov emphasizes that the credibility of any prospective agreement relies on sustained commitments to deter Russian aggression.
Zelenskyy has indicated his resistance to any decisions that would alter Ukraine’s territorial integrity without a public referendum, as mandated by Ukrainian law. As discussions unfold in Alaska, it has sparked fears of a hasty agreement that may not address the root issues or guarantee the long-term stability of the region.
In the aftermath of the summit, experts recommend a series of actions for President Trump to reinforce his position. Herbst advises that Trump should incorporate Ukraine and European allies into discussions, publicize significant arms sales, and reiterate his readiness to impose further sanctions on Russia if hostilities persist.
With an eye on the future, Guenov warns that Russia may be preparing to bolster its military capacity over the next few years, closely monitoring whether European states uphold their defense commitments and whether the US military presence remains robust in Europe. Any significant withdrawal of US troops could create an opportunity for increased Russian aggression in Europe.
Shamshur made it clear that any concessions made to Putin could be interpreted as a prelude to renewed Russian belligerence. He cautioned that the war in Europe has already commenced, underscoring the urgency for Western leaders to address this reality head-on.
Lastly, Herbst cautions against conflating a temporary cease-fire with a sustainable peace. He explained that Putin’s ultimate ambition likely still entails exerting effective political control over Ukraine, meaning that the cease-fire terms within this meeting may only reflect Russia’s current position and do not guarantee future compliance or intentions.
This critical meeting in Alaska, cloaked in historical significance and present-day urgency, sets the stage for what could be pivotal discussions over Ukraine’s fate and the broader balance of power in Europe. The outcomes of these dialogues will undoubtedly shape not only the immediate future of Ukraine but also the contours of international relations in the region for years to come.
image source from：atlanticcouncil
