In a controversial move that has raised alarm over potential authoritarian actions in the United States, President Donald Trump has ordered the mobilization of federal police from a range of agencies to patrol the streets of Washington, D.C.
This operation involves officers drawn from 15 federal agencies, including the U.S. Secret Service, the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the FBI, US Capitol Police, and the Federal Protective Service, among others.
As part of this deployment, at least 120 federal agents were visible on the streets last Friday night, in addition to the 3,400 officers from the Metropolitan Police Department. However, the White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt indicated that a much larger number may be mobilized throughout the week, extending as necessary.
President Trump has threatened a more forceful approach, including a potential federal takeover of the local D.C. government and the deployment of the National Guard. On Truth Social, he stated, “If D.C. doesn’t get its act together, and quickly, we will have no choice but to take Federal control of the City, and run this City how it should be run, and put criminals on notice that they’re not going to get away with it anymore.”
During a press briefing, Trump reiterated this intent, emphasizing the necessity of “running D.C.,” and suggested that the National Guard may need to be called in rapidly. When asked about possibly pursuing congressional repeal of D.C.’s home rule, which allows limited self-government, he confirmed that “the lawyers are already studying it.”
This aggressive maneuver appears to have been in consideration for some time, as Trump previously proposed similar actions in 2020 amid nationwide protests against police violence following the murder of George Floyd. Although National Guard units were activated then, they were not deployed into the District due to concerns over preparedness and timing. Current circumstances, however, suggest there may be little opposition during Trump’s current term in office.
To justify this substantial police presence, Trump pointed to the attempted carjacking of a former staff member of the Department of Government Efficiency, Edward Coristine, in Dupont Circle. Following the incident, two 15-year-olds were arrested and are facing charges as juveniles. Trump has called on the District of Columbia to modify its laws to enable the prosecution of these youths as adults.
Leavitt remarked that this federal involvement is designed to tackle the violence perceived to be affecting the streets of Washington, D.C. Nonetheless, FBI statistics indicate a notable decline in both violent and property crimes in the District over the past five years, despite ongoing issues related to poverty in certain areas.
Adding to the discourse, White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller presented an alarming comparison, claiming that Washington, D.C. is “more violent than Baghdad” and other global hotspots. This rhetoric insinuates that extreme military action may be warranted in the capital.
The current situation with federal agents and troops in Washington, D.C. must be contextualized within a broader trend towards accepting police-military presence within the U.S. Following his initial executive orders, Trump dispatched troops to the U.S.-Mexico border and enabled military forces to engage in combat operations against drug cartels.
Moreover, military units were recently mobilized in Los Angeles amid violence linked to ICE operations, and symbolic displays of military might were showcased during a parade in Washington, D.C. on Trump’s birthday. The scale of these strategic actions suggests a consistent effort to acclimatize the public to military presence as a form of governance.
Under existing legal frameworks, Trump has the authority to call upon and deploy the D.C. National Guard without the need for the mayor’s consent. The Home Rule Act of 1973 allows the President to assume control over the D.C. police department under specific emergency circumstances.
Throughout his presidency, Trump has invoked emergency powers extensively, affecting various policy areas, ranging from tariffs to immigration and responses to protests against the U.S.’s foreign policy in regions like Gaza.
This situation creates a stark contrast within Trump’s narrative concerning law and order, particularly regarding the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol. That event saw thousands of Trump supporters violently breach the Capitol, an incident he had incited. An unfortunate outcome of the violence was the loss of five lives and injuries to more than 130 Capitol police officers.
Upon returning to office, Trump has pardoned those convicted from the January 6 events while also dismissing law enforcement personnel involved in prosecuting the insurrection. Such actions underscore a troubling disjunction in the official narrative regarding threats to public safety.
The deployment of military force in Washington, D.C. should be regarded as a serious threat to democratic norms. This action emerges from a government grappling with significant social unrest and dissatisfaction among the populace, particularly among working-class communities.
The protests against Trump’s presidency boast historically large turnouts, notably the June 14 “No Kings” protests which reportedly involved over 10 million individuals. Current polling indicates that Trump’s approval ratings have dipped below 40 percent, illustrating a significant disconnect with many constituents.
The Democratic Party, along with trade unions, have contributed to Trump’s ability to navigate these upheavals with little effective resistance, allowing him to act as though he holds unquestioned control over both the nation and the international stage.
It is incumbent upon the working class, a potentially formidable social force, to organize a corresponding political movement that offers a critical response to the crises of capitalism as well as the escalating risk of a dictatorial regime.
Such efforts should center around the promotion of a socialist framework, effectively addressing the concerns of the working population amid the challenges posed by authoritarian governance and military escalation.
image source from：wsws
