In July, an agreement was established among European NATO allies to purchase American weapons, notably including Patriot missiles, to bolster Ukraine’s defense capabilities. Germany’s recent commitment to send two Patriot batteries to Kyiv has raised questions about the effectiveness and speed of this assistance in meeting Ukraine’s urgent military needs.
The deal, which was announced by US President Donald Trump and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte on July 14, reflects a continuation of the strategy that Western allies have employed since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine over three years ago. This approach has involved European countries supplying military equipment from their existing stockpiles to Ukraine while simultaneously replenishing their own reserves with new arms, predominantly from American manufacturers.
A significant shift, however, is the growing pressure for European nations to escalate their weapons deliveries to Ukraine, with the Trump administration yet to provide any new commitments. While arms deliveries pledged by the Biden administration are still ongoing, the situation has led to a greater urgency among European nations to meet Ukraine’s military demands.
Recent data from the German-based Kiel Institute indicates that for the first time since June 2022, Europe has outstripped the United States in total military aid to Ukraine, contributing 72 billion euros (approximately $83 billion) compared to the 65 billion euros provided by the US.
As European nations seek to strengthen their military capabilities, they have committed to increasing their defense budgets, aiming to spend 5 percent of their gross domestic product (GDP) on defense by 2034. This commitment to defense spending, reinforced during a NATO summit in The Hague in June, underscores the importance of arms destined for Ukraine in the broader context of European military preparedness.
A diplomat from an EU country, speaking anonymously, expressed that the July Washington agreement serves to maintain American involvement in Ukraine and European defense efforts, signaling that the United States stands to benefit from Europe’s anticipated defense spending surge.
Despite a keen interest in investing in their own defense industries, European countries face challenges in ramping up production. A NATO official remarked on the urgency of this process, stating, “It’s either that or leave Ukraine without weapons. There is a hard realization that this has to happen in some fashion or another.”
On July 21, the Ukraine Defense Contact Group convened online for the first time since the Washington deal was announced. This group, consisting of over 50 countries, including all NATO member states and several NATO partners, plays a crucial role in coordinating Western arms deliveries to Ukraine. During this meeting, representatives from seven countries voiced their interest in acquiring American weapon systems on behalf of Ukraine, including Canada, Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, and several Nordic nations.
On August 5, the Netherlands became the first NATO country to announce a comprehensive military aid package under the new agreement, allocating $500 million for American weapons systems and components for the Patriot missiles. Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans highlighted the Netherlands’ leadership role in supplying military equipment from American stockpiles, emphasizing that supporting Ukraine is vital to increasing pressure on Russia to negotiate.
The objective of the Contact Group, also known as the Ramstein group, involves Ukraine providing a detailed list of military needs, focusing particularly on air defense and ammunition. NATO is expected to assess the costs of procuring this military hardware, with clearer information anticipated when the group reconvenes in the fall, potentially in Ukraine for the first time.
A key concern remains the pace at which military equipment can be delivered to Ukraine. European nations aim to supply around 2 million 155-millimeter artillery shells this year, and with Ukraine beginning domestic production supported by Western funding, it is hoped that gaps left by absent American exports can be filled.
However, air defense remains a critical challenge, and Ukraine’s need for American weaponry, particularly the Patriot surface-to-air missiles, is pressing. Although the European alternative, the French-Italian SAMP-T missile defense system, has been deployed to Ukraine, doubts have emerged regarding the effectiveness of this system. Romania recently announced that it would send a third battery of the SAMP-T by fall, but NATO diplomats have indicated that the production of interceptors and related systems typically takes longer than that of the Patriots.
During the announcement of the July deal, President Trump indicated that up to 17 Patriot systems could be secured for Ukraine. Although Germany has confirmed plans to send two batteries in the near future, questions persist about the sourcing of additional systems, as Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Poland, Romania, and Spain currently operate the Patriots. Concerns remain that providing these countries’ batteries to Ukraine could leave their own air defenses vulnerable.
Both Lockheed Martin and Raytheon, the primary manufacturers of Patriot systems, have begun increasing production to meet European demands. However, given the ongoing barrage from Russian forces, Ukraine is unlikely to see the benefits of this increased production in the short term.
In conclusion, while European NATO allies are taking significant steps to engage in a major arms deal for Ukraine, the effectiveness and timeliness of these efforts remain vital issues as Ukraine continues to navigate the challenging landscape of the ongoing conflict.
image source from：rferl
