A growing number of U.S. politicians are expressing strong opposition to a recently enacted British law, the Online Safety Act, which mandates age verification for users on various websites and apps, including platforms based in the United States.
This bipartisan concern was highlighted during a trip by a group of members of Congress to London, where they met with U.K. counterparts to air their grievances regarding the implications of the law.
Vice President JD Vance, who has been vocal about this issue for months, warned against what he perceives as a move toward censorship that threatens free expression.
As part of his visit to the U.K., he reiterated these sentiments alongside British Foreign Secretary David Lammy, cautioning that the U.K. is straying onto a “very dark path.”
The Online Safety Act aims primarily to shield children from potentially harmful content, implementing measures that require internet companies to verify the ages of British users through various methods such as photo ID uploads or age-check software.
However, the law’s extensive reach caught many Britons off guard, as it applies not just to adult content but also to material featuring explicit lyrics, discussions on sensitive topics, and more.
Platforms like Reddit are complying, with certain subreddits such as r/stopsmoking and r/STD restricted due to their content.
Consequently, access to various user-generated discussion groups has become limited, invoking frustration among users who participate in these discussions.
To circumvent the law, there has been a notable rise in the use of virtual private networks (VPNs) in the U.K., allowing users to mask their location and access blocked content.
The primary argument from U.S. politicians opposing the law centers on the concern that it places undue burdens on American tech companies serving British customers.
House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan raised his objections directly with U.K. officials during meetings held in London, emphasizing that the law creates a chilling effect on free expression.
Jordan articulated this concern, stating that while protecting children and regulating harmful content is essential, the suppression of speech under the guise of safety could undermine core Western democratic values.
Looking ahead, the implications of the Online Safety Act may unfold in courtrooms if tech companies choose to contest the law’s requirements.
Alternatively, it could emerge as a focal point in trade negotiations, particularly if President Donald Trump pushes the matter during discussions with U.K. politicians, although U.K. officials assert that the law is not open for debate in such talks.
Marc Andreessen, a prominent venture capitalist and member of the Meta board, has reportedly reached out to U.K. leaders to express concerns about the law.
However, a spokesperson for Andreessen denied this assertion, casting doubt on the claim.
The Online Safety Act is notable for its comprehensive overview designed to regulate potentially harmful online content, especially concerning children.
British parliament passed the law in 2023 after an extensive two-year drafting process that aimed to address various types of content deemed harmful.
This legislation has broad implications, impacting a wide range of online content, from pornography to serious violence and dangerous stunts.
Notably, major tech companies face hefty fines of up to 10% of their global revenue if they fail to comply, which could lead to billions in penalties for larger firms.
The British regulator Ofcom emphasizes high standards for age assurance in relation to high-risk content.
Furthermore, the U.K. government has signaled its intention to enforce this law regardless of geographical boundaries, indicating an intent to hold accountable services with significant U.K. user bases.
Public opinion regarding the Online Safety Act appears to be mixed, with a YouGov poll indicating that approximately 69% of Britons support the initiative, although only 46% do so strongly.
Interestingly, a significant proportion of respondents — 52% — expressed skepticism about the law’s effectiveness in protecting minors from accessing pornographic material.
The law was initially introduced by a Conservative government but is now in effect under the current Labour administration.
Notably, the far-right party Reform U.K. is advocating for the repeal of the Online Safety Act.
Party leader Nigel Farage, a former member of Parliament, described the law as a mechanism for “state suppression of genuine free speech,” suggesting that changes have been noticeable in users’ online experiences.
Farage recently engaged with visiting members of Congress, resulting in heated exchanges, particularly focusing on the broader context of free speech in relation to Trump’s policies.
Despite the backlash, most U.S.-based tech companies report they are compliant with the new British law.
Microsoft has informed Xbox users in the U.K. about upcoming age verification prompts, expected to commence next year, while noncompliance would restrict access to social features on Xbox.
Discord plans to treat all U.K. users as minors by default, activating rigorous content filters unless users verify their age via a face scan or ID upload.
Meanwhile, Elon Musk’s platform X has also limited posts on sensitive topics such as the ongoing wars in Ukraine and Gaza, although the company has not publicly commented on the specifics surrounding the Online Safety Act.
In stark contrast, the far-right platform Gab has openly rejected compliance, blocking U.K. users entirely due to its refusal to adhere to what it describes as tyranny.
Lawyer Preston Byrne has announced intentions to challenge the British law’s enforcement within the United States through a lawsuit on behalf of an unnamed client.
The discussion around the Online Safety Act has been brewing for months, with significant moments, such as Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s visit to the White House in February.
During an Oval Office meeting, Trump was questioned about his thoughts on free speech in the context of the U.K.’s regulations, and he redirected the query to Vance, who expressed concern about the American impact.
Starmer defended the U.K.’s position, asserting a long-standing commitment to free speech within Britain.
He emphasized that the U.K. does not cross into U.S. systems in enforcement matters.
Following this, British Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy affirmed that the Online Safety Act would not be up for negotiation in trade discussions with the Trump administration.
As the discourse continues, U.S. privacy advocates remain vigilant, fearing that similar laws could emerge domestically, potentially reshaping the internet landscape in America.
image source from：nbcnews
