The Texas Card House on Harry Hines Boulevard continues to operate as a legal establishment, despite recent efforts by the City of Dallas to shut it down through costly litigation.
The city’s pursuit to close the poker room has already cost taxpayers an estimated $600,000, a staggering amount that far exceeds the mere $10 lost by this author in a game on a recent Sunday night.
The Texas Supreme Court declined to intervene in the city’s lawsuit, which aimed to invalidate the certificate of occupancy granted to the Texas Card House. This legal clash was essentially a case where the city found itself in opposition against its own administrative board, following a previous reinstatement of the CO.
At the center of this legal debacle was Andrew Espinoza, the former chief building official, who was among those attempting to retract the occupancy certificate that had been approved via due process. The Texas Card House had operated legally under existing laws, with legal guidance indicating that charging a membership fee without taking a cut from player winnings was permissible.
Owner Ryan Crow expressed relief upon hearing about the ruling from the Supreme Court, stating that the uncertainty often associated with higher courts can be daunting. While he had confidence in the legality of their operations, he acknowledged the unpredictable nature of legal proceedings.
Crow has emphasized the extensive preparation he undertook prior to opening the establishment, meeting with various city officials to ensure compliance with the law. Despite having invested substantial time and resources, the city’s abrupt revocation of the occupancy permit in December 2021 came as a shock to him and his team.
The city argued that the permit was issued in error, even as the poker room had been effectively run without any complaints from law enforcement or regulatory bodies. This ignited lengthy discussions during hearings with the Board of Adjustment, where community members advocated for the poker room as a structured and legal form of recreation.
Despite some initial hesitancy from board members to challenge city officials, the Board eventually voted unanimously to reinstate the CO, indicating that the city’s handling of the matter was not in the best interest of its citizens.
In a timeline filled with unexpected twists, the Dallas City Council pursued legal avenues to overturn the Board’s unanimous decision just ten days after their vote.
The city initially won at the district court level on October 25, 2022, but the Texas Card House managed to retain its operations through the appeals process. Ultimately, the case concluded in favor of the poker establishment when the 5th Court of Appeals determined that the trial court had overstepped its boundaries.
Former Texas Supreme Court Justice Dale Wainwright, who represented the Texas Card House, shared insights on the case’s conclusion. He surmised that the Supreme Court’s decision to refrain from hearing the case stemmed from a recognition that the Board of Adjustment’s decisions should be upheld provided they followed due diligence.
With the conclusion of this costly and misdirected legal saga, questions remain about the city’s future course of action regarding gaming establishments. Council member Chad West, who was part of the decision-making body approving the litigation, expressed regret that the situation had escalated to such an extent.
West reiterated the need for the city to adopt regulations that would allow private gaming rooms to operate without the fear of sudden closures due to political shifts. He acknowledged the tax revenue potential those facilities presented and argued that they serve as safer alternatives to underground gambling operations.
As the legal environment shifts, neighboring establishments like Champions Club Texas may find themselves benefiting from the court’s decision in the case against the City of Dallas. Champions has its own planned poker room operations not far from the vibrant Texas Card House, and they are currently preparing to present their case before the Board of Adjustment.
Crow noted the supportive community that the Texas Card House has fostered, highlighting the diverse group of individuals who frequent the location, including players from various backgrounds engaging in friendly competition.
In addition to the camaraderie among players, the venue offers a warm atmosphere complete with complementary refreshments, generating a sense of community that starkly contrasts with the perceived negativity surrounding City Hall.
After a fierce ordeal, the poker room continues to thrive, representing not only a successful business but also a space for connection among residents.
While some members of the city council have supported the legality of such establishments, others continue to pursue policies that limit their operation. The debate illustrates a larger ideological divide regarding the role of government in regulating legal gaming, prompting calls for clarity and rationality in city policies.
image source from：dallasnews
