A coalition of medical associations and public health organizations has initiated a lawsuit against the U.S. government in response to the recent decision to cease recommending COVID-19 vaccinations for most children and pregnant women.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Boston, includes the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Public Health Association, and several other prominent groups, alongside a pregnant doctor known as “Jane Doe” who works at a Massachusetts hospital.
Historically, U.S. health officials recommended annual COVID-19 vaccinations for all individuals aged 6 months and older, based on the guidance of infectious disease experts. However, in May, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. announced the controversial decision to remove COVID-19 shots from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s recommendations for healthy children and pregnant women.
This shift has drawn significant criticism from health professionals who argue that it creates confusion and undermines the established scientific review processes that have been in place for decades. Concerns have been raised that Kennedy’s actions reflect a disregard for rigorous medical evidence review, which is essential for public health policy development.
The lawsuit echoes these worries, claiming that Kennedy and other political leaders within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services have bypassed federal protocols and misled the public regarding vaccination guidance.
Further complicating the matter, the lawsuit highlights the recent overhaul of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. This month, Kennedy dismissed the previous 17-member panel, replacing it with a new group that includes several individuals known for their anti-vaccine sentiments.
Doctors express that these changes are complicating their practice, with many patients expressing doubts about vaccines in general and voicing concerns over potential loss of access to vaccinations for themselves and their children.
Dr. Susan Kressly, president of the American Academy of Pediatrics, noted that the confusion surrounding vaccines is increasing anxiety levels during pediatric visits.
This turmoil comes at a time when the United States is facing alarming health statistics, including the highest pediatric flu death rates in 15 years and what is anticipated to be the worst year for measles cases in over 30 years.
In response to inquiries, Health and Human Services spokesperson Andrew Nixon asserted that Kennedy stands by his reforms instituted at the CDC.
The suit has also garnered support from several other organizations, including the American College of Physicians, the Infectious Diseases Society of America, the Massachusetts Public Health Alliance, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine.
The pregnant doctor involved in the lawsuit wishes to receive a COVID-19 booster for the protection of her unborn child and claims that Kennedy’s decision has made it more difficult for her to access the vaccine.
During a press call, the lead attorney for the plaintiffs shared that the doctor encountered challenges when attempting to secure a COVID-19 vaccination at various pharmacy and health care locations. However, a later clarification indicated she has not yet attempted to get the shot.
The choice to file the lawsuit in Boston is significant given the city’s historical relevance in public health. The area has played key roles in pivotal public health decisions over the centuries, including early inoculation efforts during a smallpox outbreak in 1721 and the landmark 1905 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed states’ rights to enforce vaccinations.
Attorney Richard H. Hughes IV emphasized the historical importance of pursuing this case in Massachusetts, stating, “We think it is significant and very meaningful.”
image source from：wbur
