In Texas, gun bans at large public gatherings remain a common practice aimed at ensuring safety in crowded environments. Well-known venues like AT&T Stadium, Six Flags Over Texas, and Austin’s Paramount Theatre restrict firearms to prevent any potential incidents.
However, this approach faces opposition from Attorney General Ken Paxton. Paxton seeks to challenge the city of Dallas’s authority to restrict guns in public properties, supported by several members of the Republican state Legislature. The focal point of this legislative attempt is Senate Bill 1065, proposed by state Sen. Bob Hall, R-Edgewood.
Senate Bill 1065 aims to mandate that contracts between government entities and contractors must explicitly permit licensed handgun holders to carry firearms on the premises—unless prohibited by state law. This development raises significant safety concerns in light of recent events.
A particularly alarming incident occurred during a cheer competition in March at the Kay Bailey Hutchison Convention Center, which was disrupted by a shooting scare stemming from a minor argument. The concern is that Hall’s proposed bill would have compelled event organizers to permit firearms within the venue, potentially exacerbating conflicts that could lead to dire outcomes.
Should the bill be enacted, noncompliant organizations would face severe monetary penalties—up to $10,500 for each day they violate the new directive. Following a favorable vote from a Senate committee last week, the bill’s prospects for a full Senate vote have improved.
In parallel, Paxton has initiated lawsuits against Dallas over gun prohibitions at Fair Park’s Music Hall and the Majestic Theatre. Last year, when the State Fair of Texas attempted to restrict gun carry for fairgoers, Paxton vigorously contested the rule. Ultimately, his efforts were rebuffed by the Texas Supreme Court.
It remains uncertain how Paxton’s current legal challenges will unfold. However, if SB 1065 advances, the necessity for further litigation may be moot, raising questions about the allocation of taxpayer resources.
Proponents of gun access argue that lawful citizens carrying firearms can enhance safety in public spaces. Yet, the reality of a “good guy with a gun” intervening in crises carries substantial risks, especially in crowded or dimly lit venues. Trained police and security personnel are specifically equipped to handle active shooter situations, contrasting with the unpredictable nature of untrained individuals responding with firearms.
The emphasis on gun control within event management typically includes measures like controlling entry points, conducting bag checks, and utilizing metal detectors—strategies designed to keep attendees safe by barring weapons from entry altogether. The premise is that, ideally, if firearms are prohibited, attendees would not feel the necessity to carry them for personal safety.
The potential enactment of a law allowing licensed gun holders in public venues may deter event organizers from utilizing city-owned spaces, pushing them toward privately operated locations that retain more control over safety protocols. This shift could result in a loss of vital revenue for cities.
The current obsession of state officials with expansive gun rights raises significant concerns about public safety in Texas, leading many to question the overall impact on community well-being as legislation develops.
image source from：https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/editorials/2025/04/24/lawsuits-legislation-targeting-dallas-gun-ban-will-make-us-less-safe/
