The relationship between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin has long captured the attention of political analysts and observers alike.
Their unique kinship can be traced to shared feelings of victimhood that both leaders experienced in their formative years.
Trump’s childhood was marked by bullying from his father, which left a lasting impact on his self-image and view of success.
Despite achieving significant commercial success, Trump felt marginalized by New York high society, having been deemed vulgar and uncultured.
This perspective fostered a lingering resentment in him, particularly shaped by various failed business ventures that reaffirmed the narrative of inadequacy instilled by his father.
Similarly, Vladimir Putin’s early life was plagued by bullying in his neighborhood, where his modest beginnings afforded him little social clout.
Unlike Trump, Putin’s journey involved overcoming physical disadvantages; he turned to judo to gain confidence and joined the KGB in pursuit of greater power.
Nevertheless, even his KGB career had its struggles, including feeling overlooked during his posting in Dresden.
Both leaders emerged with a deeply ingrained sense of indignity stemming from their youthful experiences of victimization.
This shared sentiment manifests not only in their personal lives but also influences their approaches to leadership and national destiny.
Trump and Putin have leveraged their personal grievances into broader narratives, turning their respective nations into vehicles for their compensations.
In doing so, they channel their victimhood into a poignant political project, which keeps their supporters engaged in a cycle of resentment.
Furthermore, a significant influence on the Putin-Trump axis is how Putin essentially crafted a blueprint for Trump’s political strategy with his own adaptation of the ‘Make America Great Again’ (MAGA) mantra.
The essence of MAGA lies in nostalgia for an idealized past, as articulated by Trump, who attributes America’s decline to various political figures and foreign nations.
In this narrative, Trump posits that America was undermined by the actions of leaders like the Clintons, Barack Obama, and Biden, who allegedly allowed other countries to exploit the United States.
This tactic mirrors Putin’s earlier narrative concerning Russia’s historical grievances.
Putin has characterized the collapse of the Soviet Union as a monumental geopolitical disaster, assigning blame to his predecessors and accusing Western nations of deception regarding NATO expansion.
Both political figures have effectively tapped into the resentment of their respective constituencies, utilizing a longing for a supposed glorious past as a rallying cry.
This shared nostalgia not only galvanizes their political bases but also presents a troubling paradox.
Given that their political triumphs depend on fostering this sense of grievance, improving the conditions of their supporters would inadvertently undermine the very basis of their appeal.
Thus, the promise of Making [Russia/America] Great Again becomes a façade rather than a genuine endeavor.
While Putin has made grand claims about revitalizing Russia’s former power, the reality has not matched his visions.
Efforts to reclaim influence over former Soviet territories have largely backfired, antagonizing countries like Georgia and Ukraine, while initiating militarization in Poland and the Baltic states.
Even Armenia, once considered a client state, has sought closer ties with the European Union, signaling dissatisfaction with Russian dominance.
Moreover, Putin’s ambitious ambitions for economic recovery and modernization have sharply fallen short.
The once-promising Skolkovo high-tech park stands as a symbol of decay, marred by allegations of mismanagement and corruption.
Since the imposition of Western sanctions following the annexation of Crimea, Putin has claimed these measures would spur domestic production, yet reliance on imports has remained a stark reality.
Similarly, Trump’s rhetoric about revitalizing American manufacturing has revealed its hollow nature, as true reforms would risk alienating his base.
Both leaders, caught in their cycles of resentment and victimhood, show little incentive to activate genuine improvement for their countries, risking their own political viability.
As the historical parallels between Trump and Putin create a compelling narrative, it remains essential to recognize the underlying vulnerabilities that shape their leadership and the political landscapes of their nations.
image source from：https://www.theglobalist.com/united-states-russia-donald-trump-vladimir-putin/
