In a call to action, Rep. Kevin McCabe, R-Wasilla, advocates for Alaska to pursue 404 primacy under the Clean Water Act, which would allow the state to manage its own wetlands and water resources.
Passed in 1972, Section 404 of the Clean Water Act regulates the discharge of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States, including wetlands but has primarily been administered at the federal level.
While only Michigan and New Jersey have taken on this responsibility, McCabe highlights the unique position of Alaska, which contains more wetlands than the rest of the nation combined, with over 174 million acres making up 43 percent of the state’s landmass.
“No other state has more at stake,” he asserts, emphasizing the need for Alaskans to be in control of their own environmental management.
McCabe argues that the people who live and work in Alaska understand the local terrain and ecosystem better than federal agencies.
Currently, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the EPA manage permitting processes. However, McCabe points out that these agencies do not reside in Alaska and do not comprehend the complexities of the state’s unique environment.
He insists that Alaskans should be the ones regulating and permitting Alaskan projects, as they are more accountable to local voters and stakeholders.
Concerns have been raised that the move towards 404 primacy is merely a pathway to expedite controversial projects like the Pebble Mine.
However, McCabe counters that under state administration, federal safeguards would still be upheld, and the EPA would retain its veto authority under Section 404(c).
The potential risks of a federal administration that favors certain projects underscore the importance of local control.
“Wouldn’t Alaskans want more local input? More local control?” he questions, illustrating the need for state involvement as a counterbalance to federal oversight.
Furthermore, he explains that with state primacy, permit reviews would be conducted by individuals who understand the land intimately, presenting an opportunity for better communication and accountability compared to the distant EPA offices in Washington, D.C.
Alaska has already successfully assumed primacy over other parts of the Clean Water Act, such as Sections 401 and 402, and has shown capacity in managing programs under the Clean Air Act.
McCabe emphasizes that Alaska’s experience positions the state to effectively handle 404 primacy while maintaining high environmental standards.
“State primacy does not mean lower standards,” he clarifies.
Instead, he suggests that it would mean the same standards enforced by people who are intimately familiar with Alaska’s unique environmental landscape.
Faster and more efficient permit processing could lead to significant progress on rural energy systems, broadband expansion, and vital infrastructure projects within the state.
Currently, federal permitting processes often lead to prolonged delays, costing communities crucial time and financial resources at a time when quick action is desperately needed.
McCabe calls for a shift that would help empower Native communities, Tribes, and local stakeholders who often feel marginalized by a disconnected federal bureaucracy.
With state primacy, Alaska could engage directly with these communities, incorporating their knowledge into decision-making processes effectively.
Federal agencies are often influenced by the political climate, leading to inconsistent definitions and regulations that make long-term project planning difficult.
In turn, McCabe argues that 404 primacy could provide a sense of continuity and reassurance, allowing Alaskans to navigate permits for various projects, from oil operations to water systems, under stable rules.
The people of Alaska care deeply about their land and waters, as it is not just a resource but a way of life that affects families for generations.
Rep. McCabe is confident that Alaskans possess the expertise, motivation, and reverence necessary to protect their environment effectively.
He makes a compelling case that by pursuing 404 primacy, the state can take control of its waters and resources while upholding environmental protections.
This is not merely a policy move; it is a declaration of self-determination, a necessary step towards preventing external forces from dictating Alaska’s future.
“It’s time to trust Alaskans to do what we’ve always done best—protect and manage our own land and waters, with the care and responsibility only true stewards can provide,” he concludes.
image source from：https://www.adn.com/opinions/2025/04/24/opinion-alaskans-not-washington-should-manage-our-wetlands/
