San Francisco’s Mayor Daniel Lurie is facing mounting criticism from city supervisors and local nonprofits regarding his proposed budget cuts to vital programs such as legal aid, financial coaching, and community building initiatives.
During a recent budget committee meeting of the Board of Supervisors, Supervisor Connie Chan raised concerns about the implications of these cuts, particularly in a time when nonprofits are already under pressure from potential federal funding reductions.
“How do we prioritize our values?” Chan questioned, emphasizing the need for the city to support vulnerable communities. She highlighted the chaotic political climate at both the state and federal levels, which has resulted in potential cuts to nonprofit support, stating that San Francisco should seek to fill in gaps where needed.
However, the city is grappling with an $818 million budget deficit, prompting Lurie to request a 15 percent reduction across all departments. This has resulted in proposed cuts to essential programs that protect residents from informal evictions and wage theft, particularly impacting the Mayor’s Office of Housing and Community Development (MOHCD).
Dan Adams, a director at MOHCD, addressed the crowd at the hearing, which was full of legal professionals, nonprofit workers, and residents who rely on city services. He described the funding reductions as painful and difficult decisions that were needed due to the budget constraints.
As Mayor Lurie prepares to finalize his budget proposal ahead of the June 1 deadline, organizations providing legal aid, community programs, and financial capability services remain in jeopardy.
The MOHCD clarified that the proposed cuts were based on feedback from surveys, assessing community priorities, as well as evaluations of funding proposals from nonprofits seeking support. Yet, Supervisor Joel Engardio questioned whether these scoring methods truly reflect the needs of the community, receiving applause from the audience.
He advocated for the preservation of funding for civil legal services, asserting that such programs are crucial in preventing homelessness by offering free legal aid that helps individuals maintain their housing.
Certain legal aid programs, particularly those addressing domestic violence and formal evictions, remain protected. However, the cuts could significantly impact the broader range of nonprofit services that MOHCD supports, including general civil legal assistance, which faces cuts of roughly $4.2 million.
Local nonprofits have expressed their distress as they navigate budgetary pressures from both local and federal sources. For example, the Asian Women’s Shelter reported receiving notice of a substantial federal grant cut, which could further exacerbate its financial situation if it cannot secure local funding in May.
The Hype Center, which serves at-risk youth, is poised for an 85 percent budget reduction, effectively threatening its operational viability.
Open Door Legal’s executive director, Adrian Tirtanadi, presented data indicating that if the proposed cuts are enacted, homelessness in San Francisco could rise by 4 percent. The nonprofit, which provides free legal services, anticipates having to close one of its locations and may have to lay off around 15 staff members.
At the hearing, an array of clients who benefited from free legal services shared their stories, emphasizing the importance of these programs in their lives. One limousine driver recounted how Open Door Legal assisted him in keeping his license after he faced legal action from a dissatisfied passenger.
“Without them, I would be homeless on the street,” the driver remarked, highlighting the critical role these services play in maintaining housing stability.
As the deadline for budget adjustments looms, MOHCD has been tasked with an additional $2.1 million reduction in funding, which further raises concerns about the future of community programs. When queried about the potential impact of these additional cuts, Adams noted the commitment to mitigating their effects on essential community services.
As the public awaits Mayor Lurie’s final budget proposal in June, the outcry from supervisors and nonprofits continues to resonate, stressing the need to protect essential services that directly support the city’s most vulnerable populations.
image source from：https://missionlocal.org/2025/04/s-f-supervisors-nonprofits-sound-alarm-on-mayor-luries-cuts-to-free-civil-legal-aid/
