The NFL Draft often showcases a quarterback-heavy lineup, yet this year brought the surprising plummet of Shedeur Sanders, who was anticipated to be picked much earlier than the fifth round.
Fans and analysts alike debated Sanders’ status for several days, particularly as he went unselected well into the draft process.
Eventually, the Cleveland Browns chose the Colorado star at No. 144 overall, a decision that many viewed as indicative of his disappointing draft trajectory.
The discussion regarding Sanders shifts toward his performance and the factors contributing to this significant drop in selection.
Evaluators noted various concerns regarding Sanders, particularly about his throwing motion and the protection he received during his time at Colorado, suggesting these factors contributed to his fall in the draft.
An NFL offensive coordinator remarked, “Shedeur has some leaks in his throwing motion… he doesn’t have an exceptional arm or running ability. He’s streaky.”
Additionally, another NFL offensive coordinator described Sanders as “really developmental” but acknowledged his toughness and intelligence as assets.
It was evident that his role as a star quarterback at previous schools, including Jackson State and Colorado, complicated his fit in the NFL, as he now has to compete against established players like Dillon Gabriel and 40-year-old Joe Flacco in Cleveland.
NFL personnel highlighted the importance of a developmental quarterback being ready to support a starter, which may have hampered Sanders’ appeal in an atmosphere where competition is high and comfort is key.
Not participating in the Senior Bowl or the NFL Scouting Combine also raised concerns regarding his preparedness for the NFL level, leading some scouts to conclude that it wasn’t surprising to see him wait so long in the draft.
One former NFL quarterbacks coach described the feedback regarding Sanders’ self-awareness and leverage in the draft as “shocking.”
Now, with the draft process behind him, Sanders faces the pressure of defying the expectations set by many evaluators.
In terms of first-round performances, the most exciting selection was the Arizona Cardinals picking Ole Miss defensive tackle Walter Nolen.
Nolen registered impressive stats, boasting 14 tackles for loss last season, and he has drawn praise as a special talent with a high ceiling.
An NFL defensive line coach noted, “He’s twitched up and his change of direction is off the charts,” emphasizing the need for Nolen to enhance his study of the game to reach his potential.
Concerns about attitude akin to those surrounding Jalen Carter were mentioned by coaches, but many believe that Nolen is surrounded by veteran players like Calais Campbell and Dalvin Tomlinson, who can bolster his development.
Conversely, a questionable move came from the New York Giants trading back into the first round to select Ole Miss quarterback Jaxson Dart.
Given that the Giants face a pivotal moment in their franchise with a head coach reportedly on the hot seat, it raised questions about potential resources allocated toward the quarterback position instead of filling pressing needs.
There appeared to be skepticism over Dart’s readiness to take on the starting role this season and whether his selection would pay dividends for a team in flux.
Further analysis brought attention to Texas quarterback Quinn Ewers, whose seventh-round selection by the Miami Dolphins surprised many.
Once heralded as the top high school quarterback prospect, Ewers received only modest NFL feedback, which translated into a late draft selection.
Despite his previous acclaim, coaches seemed uncertain about Ewers’ future in the NFL, with concerns about his performances while at Texas.
The current environment favors players with a more established history of success in college, as seen in Ewers’ case compared to other promising quarterbacks.
As for the New England Patriots, their draft presence stood out positively, with selections including TreVeyon Henderson, a standout running back whose explosive style is expected to shine in third-down situations.
Additionally, the acquisition of wide receiver Kyle Williams and safety Craig Woodson reflects a strategic effort to bolster the team with productive college talent.
The Buccaneers also impressed in their draft haul, acquiring first-rounder Emeka Egbuka, a player regarded as near “can’t miss” status.
Other notable picks included cornerback Benjamin Morrison and speedster Tez Johnson, both seen as quality additions to Tampa Bay’s roster.
A notable highlight of the draft was the athletic prowess demonstrated by South Carolina safety Nick Emmanwori, who showcased elite athleticism at the NFL combine.
Though his selection in the second round may raise eyebrows, many coaches believe he has the potential to be an exceptional player in the league.
Meanwhile, Green Bay’s selection of Matthew Golden bolstered their offense, adding speed and agility to their wide receiver corps.
Furthermore, the choice of TCU’s Savion Williams reflects an anticipation of versatility and impact similar to that of Deebo Samuel.
The Las Vegas Raiders also made notable selections, such as wide receiver Dont’e Thornton, who, while possessing impressive physical traits, grapples with route-running consistency.
Other intriguing selections included William & Mary tackle Charles Grant, alongside quarterback Touchdown Tommy Mellott, demonstrating the Raiders’ focus on athletic potential.
Lastly, the evolution of LSU into a wide receiver factory continues to be recognized, with Jack Bech representing the program’s thriving pipeline of talent and signaling LSU’s strong influence in the draft landscape.
image source from：https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/6315722/2025/04/28/nfl-draft-2025-takeaways-shedeur-sanders-first-round-picks/
