The New York Knicks and the Indiana Pacers are set to face off in the Eastern Conference finals, with both teams basking in the glow of successful seasons.
The Knicks concluded the regular season with an impressive 51 wins, while the Pacers followed closely behind at 50 victories.
This matchup is particularly intriguing considering how both teams upset opponents with 60-plus wins in previous rounds, which adds additional excitement to the series.
Both squads boast significant offensive firepower and have surprisingly improved their defensive metrics in the playoffs, despite allowing 113.3 points per 100 possessions during the regular season.
However, despite their shared achievements, these two teams exhibit stark contrasts in their playing styles.
The Pacers are known for their deep roster that prioritizes constant movement and ball sharing, while the Knicks take a more methodical approach, often leaning heavily on their starters to deliver.
The anticipated clash of these contrasting styles promises to produce a captivating series, starting with Game 1 at Madison Square Garden on Wednesday.
### Question 1: Can the Pacers Control the Boards?
A key factor in this series will be Indiana’s ability to keep the Knicks from dominating the glass.
Historically, the Knicks have been formidable on the boards, and this characteristic has remained intact despite the new dynamics following their roster revamp since last year.
“It’s a different time… the dynamics are a lot different,” said Pacers coach Rick Carlisle.
In the previous postseason, the Knicks showcased their rebounding prowess, particularly in their three victories against the Pacers.
This trend continues to be bolstered by Mitchell Robinson’s presence on the floor, who has significantly contributed to the Knicks’ offensive rebounding, leading to high points per possession after offensive boards.
As noted, New York has scored an impressive 131.8 points per 100 possessions after offensive rebounds, showcasing how critical second chances will be for their success.
Carlisle acknowledged the rebounding challenge, stating that it “is a daunting problem” for his team.
Controlling the boards also plays into the pace of the game; if the Pacers must send multiple players to secure rebounds, they will struggle to initiate their fast-paced transition offense.
Tyrese Haliburton, a key player for Indiana, emphasized the importance of limiting the Knicks to one shot per possession if they want to compete effectively.
Despite being below-average in defensive rebounding this past season, Indiana intends to combat New York’s strength by crashing the glass themselves.
Carlisle reinforced the necessity of being prepared for the physical battle expected in the paint.
### Question 2: Can the Knicks Maintain Their Defensive Success?
New York enters this series claiming that their battles against the Boston Celtics have prepared them for the Pacers’ fast-paced offense.
Josh Hart highlighted how the Knicks had to elevate their communication and execution during the intense final games against Boston, hoping to carry that success into the next phase.
During their previous series, the Knicks adjusted to a switching defensive scheme against the Celtics that allowed them to minimize rotations and keep Boston from leveraging their offensive talent effectively.
This tactic will likely be put to the test against a Pacers team known for its unselfishness and fast ball movement, which can exploit defensive errors.
Mikal Bridges acknowledged the craftiness and aggressiveness of Indiana’s ballhandlers, implying that New York must remain sharp and prevent defensive breakdowns due to excessive switching.
The Knicks will have to strike a balance between aggressive defense while also being careful not to leave open paths for scoring.
Brunson underscored the challenge ahead, noting that Indiana’s high-speed style makes it essential for the Knicks to remain composed in their defensive assignments.
New York’s transition defense will be crucial; they will be tested, especially against a team whose identity revolves around maintaining quick pace and ball movement, according to Brunson.
### Question 3: How Will Indiana Adapt Defensively?
As Indiana faces off against New York, the selection of defensive matchups will be vital to the Pacers’ success.
In regular-season encounters, the Pacers shied away from directly matching up their wings against Karl-Anthony Towns during pick-and-roll situations, which resulted in poor defensive outcomes for them.
The question remains whether Indiana will adjust their strategy in Game 1 or wait until they see how things unfold.
Myles Turner’s role in defending Towns is critical; if Turner does not engage directly, the responsibility may fall on players like Pascal Siakam or Aaron Nesmith.
Moreover, the defensive assignment for Brunson is also a point of intrigue, with Andrew Nembhard and Nesmith both featured in previous series but handling the role differently.
Nesmith’s physicality may serve him well against Brunson, but the team must be cautious about foul trouble, especially with such a strategic matchup.
Furthermore, with Haliburton’s potential to be targeted on defense, Indiana must decide how best to deploy its best defensive assets against the Knicks’ emerging talents.
As Indiana considers its options, rookies like Jarace Walker may prove advantageous, owing to their ability to switch effectively due to their size and agility.
### Question 4: Can Indiana Outlast New York’s Starters?
Understanding the rotations will be pivotal in this series, as Indiana possesses a deep lineup compared to New York’s reliance on its starters.
Haliburton communicated the desire for Indiana to exhaust New York’s top players, suggesting that the second unit’s performance will be key in keeping the intensity high.
Players like T.J. McConnell have historically troubled the Knicks and could create matchup problems if he can effectively capitalize on transition opportunities.
The fatigue factor is a central theme; if New York’s starters are logging extensive minutes, Indiana aims to leverage that weariness through their more extensive rotation.
With a lengthy series likely, the Pacers hope that their depth will provide them with the upper hand as the games progress.
Despite the potential for fatigue, the Knicks are counting on their main contributors to maintain high performance levels as they pursue victory.
Hart has acknowledged this dilemma by stressing the importance of the players managing their workloads effectively over the course of the series.
### Question 5: Will Thibodeau Implement Surprises?
While Tom Thibodeau is known for his consistency in offensive and defensive strategies, there are questions around whether he will introduce changes given the stakes of the Eastern Conference finals.
Haliburton identified Thibodeau as an “old school” coach, suggesting a flatline approach in sticking to established concepts.
However, the Knicks did exhibit a willingness to adapt against the Celtics, shifting from conventional strategies to a higher frequency of switches, indicating the ability to modify tactics when necessary.
If further adjustments are warranted as the series unfolds, speculation arises regarding potential changes in the starting lineup.
With concerns over performance from certain players, Thibodeau may experiment with different configurations should issues arise.
A surprise element like zone defense could also be employed at times to relieve pressure off weaker defenders, though the Knicks have rarely ventured into such territory historically.
The series is poised to be a showcase of different basketball philosophies, from New York’s steadfast methodology to Indiana’s agile playstyle.
Both teams will look to impose their will on the court as they vie for a chance to advance to the NBA Finals.
As both squads prepare, the tension builds for an exciting matchup that promises to captivate basketball fans everywhere.
image source from：https://www.cbssports.com/nba/news/knicks-vs-pacers-five-questions-ahead-of-the-eastern-conference-finals-including-which-matchups-work-best/
