In a significant legal victory, two doctors from Harvard Medical School have successfully restored their research articles after filing a lawsuit against the Trump administration, according to a statement from the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on Friday.
The research, previously featured on the Patient Safety Network, a federal platform for sharing information about medical errors and patient outcomes, had been removed under controversial circumstances.
The articles in question, one titled “Endometriosis: A Common and Commonly Missed and Delayed Diagnosis” and the other “Multiple Missed Opportunities for Suicide Risk Assessment in Emergency and Primary Care Settings,” were co-authored by Dr. Celeste Royce and Dr. Gordon Schiff, the ACLU reported.
The removal of these articles raised concerns when it was revealed that they contained critical discussions about health matters concerning transgender and gender-nonconforming individuals, as well as suicide risks within LGBTQ+ communities.
Dr. Schiff expressed alarm over the implications of such censorship, stating, “This type of wholesale, non-evidence-based removal endangers everyone’s safety.” He emphasized that restricting access to vital information about marginalized populations undermines public health missions.
President Donald Trump issued an executive order shortly after taking office in January, mandating that federal agencies eliminate all references that “promote or otherwise inculcate gender ideology.”
This directive instigated widespread action by federal agencies, including guidance from the Office of Personnel Management to take down materials deemed to promote gender ideology from all platforms.
Dr. Royce remarked on the detrimental impact of these removals, suggesting that prioritizing political agendas over factual medical information jeopardizes trust in medical research and patient care.
The doctors were backed in their lawsuit by the Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic at Yale Law School, as well as the ACLU and ACLU of Massachusetts. They argued that the removal of their articles not only violated First Amendment rights but also breached the Administrative Procedure Act by lacking a rational foundation for the deletions.
Scarlet Kim, a senior staff attorney at the ACLU, condemned the takedown as a direct attack on scientific discourse. Kim asserted, “The First Amendment protects against the removal of our clients’ research solely because the government disagrees with its message. The government cannot suppress medical knowledge because it acknowledges the existence of transgender people.”
On Friday, a federal judge ruled that the articles must be reinstated within seven days, and they must appear in their complete, unaltered forms.
The removal of the research coincided with the Trump administration’s broader agenda, which included cuts to various federal programs and departments that contradicted his executive orders impacting LGBTQ+ rights.
This included defining two genders and imposing a military ban on transgender service members, among other initiatives.
Kim hailed the judge’s decision as a win for free speech and scientific integrity, affirming that the government’s actions cannot dictate which information is shared based on ideology.
“This is a victory for our clients, for free speech, and for scientific integrity,” Kim declared, reinforcing the importance of patient safety and the integrity of medical information in healthcare.
image source from：https://www.masslive.com/boston/2025/05/harvard-doctors-research-articles-must-be-restored-after-trump-admin-sued.html
