As the fiscal 2026 budget negotiations unfold in Massachusetts, state lawmakers find themselves navigating a treacherous economic landscape shaped by uncertainty from Washington, D.C.
Doug Howgate, president of the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, and his team are focused on analyzing the shifting federal policies that could significantly influence state resources and spending.
In a recent interview within his downtown Boston office, Howgate emphasized the importance of coordinated conversations among government branches regarding resource allocation.
“So many of these challenging things are going to be made in connection to resource decisions,” he stated.
The Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation has recently published its annual analyses of the House and Senate budgets, along with additional reports examining the implications of changing federal outlooks for Massachusetts governance.
Howgate highlighted the surprising context in which the current state budgets are being formed.
There were few surprises within the specifics of the governor’s, House’s, or Senate’s proposed budgets; rather, the unexpected factors stem from external conditions, such as federal policy shifts impacting taxes and healthcare funding.
The economic implications of tariff announcements earlier this year further contributed to a sense of volatility, according to Howgate.
In his forecast for budget discussions, Howgate asserts that the best course of action for the Legislature would be to adhere to its traditional budget timeline.
After making initial adjustments in April, it is preferable to reassess before finalizing the budget for the governor’s approval, ensuring that lawmakers maintain a steady focus on state revenue collections.
April collections provided critical insights about key revenue streams, thus allowing for better-informed fiscal decisions.
This stabilizing approach aims to prevent chaos from excessive adjustments within a short period given the ongoing uncertainties surrounding federal policies, such as Medicaid and taxes.
The fluctuating stock market and capital gains revenue present another layer of complexity for state budget considerations.
Howgate points out that economic conditions can shift drastically, and while the state has measures to mitigate revenue source volatility, substantial economic upheaval could have adverse effects on the state budget.
The relatively strong revenue collections in April should be understood in the context of past stock market performance and not as a forecast for future income.
This careful disentangling of economic indicators is crucial, especially when anticipating potential revenue shortfalls during an economic downturn.
Howgate has observed that there has been a recent trend in Massachusetts of adjusting revenues based on newly available information, a practice that was notably utilized during the pandemic.
The Legislature worked collaboratively to adapt their revenue forecasts in response to the pandemic’s unforeseen impacts.
With the recent unexpected surge in tax collections indicating a need for revised revenue assumptions, there is an ongoing effort to coordinate actions among the Governor, Legislature, and stakeholders in crafting a budget that accurately reflects available resources.
The budget differential of approximately $70 million between the Senate and House proposals reflects varying fiscal priorities, particularly concerning transportation financing.
The Senate took a distinct approach relative to the governor’s proposal, indicating divergent priorities that will require careful reconciliation.
Concern has been expressed regarding substantial spending increases, especially given the uncertain fiscal environment.
Finding a balance between spending growth and long-term revenue growth is essential for sustainable budget management.
Howgate emphasizes the need for reforms within costly programs, such as MassHealth’s personal care attendant initiative, to proactively manage expenses amidst increasing demands on state resources.
Additionally, the House budget’s pause on vocational school admission decisions underscores the Legislature’s role in shaping educational policies, reinforcing the essential collaboration between governing bodies.
Consensus among stakeholders is vital to ensure that equitable access to vocational opportunities is maintained, promoting economic advancement for students.
On the health front, the Senate’s push to lower prescription drug costs indicates a consistent commitment to addressing healthcare affordability.
Howgate notes the significance of implementing previously established drug cost reduction frameworks rather than introducing new reforms prematurely.
Given budget constraints and ongoing pressures facing healthcare systems, careful consideration is required to avoid exacerbating uncertainties.
Concerns surrounding proposed Medicaid cuts emerged as a pressing issue during discussions about federal budget proposals.
Howgate reiterated the importance of understanding the timeline and specifics of these proposals, as immediate impacts on the state budget may not be as dire as originally feared.
He pointed out that while proposed reductions could affect Medicaid funding in future fiscal years, the current budgetary impact remains unclear, emphasizing the importance of strategic long-term planning.
As Massachusetts prepares its budget, Howgate urges lawmakers to be vigilant about the potential fallout from both domestic policies and external economic factors, especially in light of possible economic downturns.
Drawing on past experiences, particularly during the Great Recession, Howgate stresses the need for preparedness in the face of future challenges that could resonate with budget discussions.
Ultimately, the uncertain economic policy landscape stemming from the Trump administration raises fundamental questions regarding higher education, immigration, and the ability to sustain a growing labor force in Massachusetts.
Howgate concludes that while specific fiscal costs may be difficult to quantify, the pervasive uncertainty surrounding federal policies carries significant implications for the state’s economic environment and governance strategies.
image source from：https://www.masslive.com/politics/2025/06/beacon-hills-budget-balancing-act-just-got-trickier-an-expert-explains.html
