In a shocking series of events, the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP), a small federal agency dedicated to fostering global peace, found itself at the mercy of a rapid and ruthless takeover by Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Originally created by an act of Congress and signed into law by President Ronald Reagan in 1985, the USIP has long served as an independent, nonprofit think tank, funded by the government, with the goal of preventing and ending conflicts worldwide.
However, as of March 28, the hope for a peaceful resolution began to fade when termination notices flooded the personal emails of nearly all of the institute’s 300 employees, resulting in profound turmoil within the organization.
The series of firings began with the abrupt dismissal of most of the institute’s board members on March 14, which left only a few acting in ex officio roles. Despite attempts by acting president George Moose and legal counsel George Foote to clarify that the institute operated independently, DOGE pressed on, initially failing to establish control over the building due to a standoff with security personnel.
In an aggressive display of power, DOGE sought assistance from the FBI to gain access to the headquarters. After a tense series of events, local law enforcement officers escorted former USIP leadership out of the building.
The rapid-fire takeover culminated on March 28 when, shortly before midnight, nearly all USIP employees learned they had been let go, resulting in a chaotic atmosphere as thousands lost their jobs and (for many) their health insurance.
As the smoke began to clear, U.S. District Judge Beryl A. Howell voiced concern over the legal ramifications of DOGE’s actions, emphasizing the complexity of restoring the institute to its former state. “A bull in a China shop breaks a lot of things,” she commented.
In the weeks following the court’s initial ruling in favor of reinstating control to the original board, it has become evident that the consequences of the rapid takeover were far-reaching and would significantly affect both the institute’s future and the global partners it supports.
The DHS’ rationale for its actions stemmed from Executive Order 14217, issued during the Trump administration, which sought to “dramatically reduce the size of the federal government.”
Amidst the tumult, reports from employees indicated the dysfunction reached far beyond staffing issues. With overseas projects aimed at preventing terrorism and promoting peace left without support, former partners in conflict zones like Afghanistan, Mali, and Burkina Faso found themselves abandoned, contributing to escalating instability in those areas.
As the institute slowly attempts to revive operations, key staff members are grappling with extensive barriers and despair over the future. O’Brien, the security officer, described a scenario in which a small portion of the staff—only about 10% of normal attendance—is currently engaged in maintaining essential functions and restoring critical systems in the aftermath of the sudden upheaval.
In a reflection of the damage caused by the rash transition, acting director Nicoletta Barbera expressed particular concern for the impact on international programming.
With initiatives designed to empower youth and women to prevent radicalization at risk, Barbera highlighted the devastating consequences of the institute’s abrupt disruption, particularly in light of a recent attack in Burkina Faso.
The judge’s ruling noted that the government had failed to follow proper procedures in dismissing the initial board members, rendering subsequent actions—including property transfers—null and void.
While Judge Howell’s opinion affirmed the USIP’s independence from the executive branch, the government signaled plans to appeal, indicating that the struggle over control and future operations may be far from over.
Though some semblance of order is being restored, the true impact of the events will likely linger long after the dust settles. The institute faces the daunting task of not just rebuilding its staff and operations but also repairing relationships and trust with partners around the world.
As Moose has stated, the speed at which they can get back to work hinges not only on internal recovery but also on the ongoing appeals process that could further stall their efforts.
The chaotic takeover serves as a cautionary tale for other agencies similarly embroiled in DOGE’s strategies, illustrating how quickly established organizations can be dismantled when subjected to unchecked authority.
In the face of such upheaval, the USIP’s mission to promote global peace hangs in the balance, underscoring the dire consequences of federal mismanagement in sensitive areas of international engagement.
image source from：https://mynorthwest.com/national/elon-musk-is-gone-but-doges-actions-are-hard-to-reverse-the-us-institute-of-peace-is-a-case-study/4096188
