In a dramatic turn of events, President Donald Trump announced that the U.S. military conducted strikes on three Iranian sites, targeting nuclear facilities in Fordo, Isfahan, and Natanz. This operation involved the use of ‘bunker-buster bombs’ aimed at thwarting Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
“Congratulations to our great American warriors,” Trump proclaimed on his Truth Social platform. He emphasized that there is no other military globally capable of such operations, stating, “Now is the time for peace.”
Following the strikes, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth addressed the media. He expressed confidence that the U.S. would not be drawn into a lengthy conflict with Iran, despite the regime’s vows of retaliation. Hegseth remarked, “As the president has directed and made clear, this is most certainly not open-ended.”
Iran has made a grave threat to blockade the Strait of Hormuz, a vital international shipping route through which approximately one-fifth of the world’s oil supply flows. Experts warn that such a blockade could jeopardize global energy markets, intensifying international tensions.
Responses from lawmakers have been polarized, reflecting the divide in public sentiment regarding military action in the Middle East.
Senator Jim Banks, a Republican from Indiana, expressed trust in President Trump’s decisions, stating, “I trust President Trump!”
Similarly, Representative Mike Bost from Illinois’ 12th district supported the president, claiming the military action resulted from intelligence indicating that Iran was nearing the capability to develop nuclear weapons that could endanger American lives globally. Bost emphasized Trump’s decisive strength in preventing such threats.
Conversely, Democratic Senator Tammy Duckworth raised concerns about the implications of the bombing, asserting that it puts American troops and civilians at greater risk. She criticized the Trump Administration for not seeking Congressional approval before escalating military involvement in the region, which she decried as unconstitutional. Duckworth insisted that diplomatic avenues should have been explored before resorting to military action.
In a similar vein, Senator Dick Durbin from Illinois criticized Trump’s previous actions that led to the deterioration of the Iran nuclear deal, which had established necessary inspections to prevent nuclear development. He contended that Trump’s bombing raid has pushed the U.S. closer to war in the Middle East, noting that such moves lack the required Congressional consent.
Democratic Representative Bill Foster stated his intention to return to Washington immediately, calling on Congress to demand detailed information regarding the situation in Iran, including the status of its nuclear materials and the U.S.’s plans for further engagement.
Representative Robin Kelly expressed her belief that the strikes would not promote peace but rather exacerbate violence and conflict in the region. She highlighted the irony that the instability was a consequence of President Trump’s decision to withdraw from the Iran Nuclear Deal, which allowed Iran to accelerate its nuclear program. Kelly insisted that the Trump Administration seek Congressional approval for military action.
Republican Representative Darin LaHood underscored the administration’s stance that Iran must not be allowed to develop nuclear weapons. He expressed gratitude to American service members and the intelligence community for their role in maintaining national security.
Representative Mary Miller, also a Republican from Illinois, framed the military action as a significant victory, arguing that President Trump’s approach embodies the principle of peace through strength, asserting that it ensures safety for the U.S. and the globe.
Meanwhile, Democratic Representative Jan Schakowsky stressed that the majority of Americans do not support further military involvement in the Middle East. She labeled Trump’s actions as unconstitutional and called for immediate action from Congress to vote on the War Powers Resolution, emphasizing the necessity for diplomatic resolution rather than continued warfare.
Republican Senator Todd Young acknowledged the bravery of the service members involved in the mission and expressed optimism that the elimination of Iran’s nuclear capabilities would contribute to global safety. He looks forward to upcoming briefings on the situation.
As reactions continue to unfold, the threat of retaliation from Iran looms large, raising significant concerns about the potential for an extended conflict and the safety of U.S. personnel in the region. With many lawmakers urging caution and a return to diplomatic dialogue, the path forward remains uncertain. The implications of these military actions could resonate well beyond the immediate geopolitical landscape, impacting global security, energy markets, and international relations.
image source from：nbcchicago
