In a dramatic escalation of military involvement in the Middle East, President Donald Trump announced on Saturday that the United States had conducted precision strikes on three significant nuclear facilities in Iran: Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan.
These operations were executed with substantial firepower, utilizing massive bombs delivered by B-2 stealth bombers, alongside U.S. Navy submarines which launched over 30 Tomahawk missiles at various targets within Iran.
The President’s announcement signals a major shift in U.S. policy towards Iran, essentially aligning with Israel’s ongoing military actions against the Iranian regime.
In a speech from the White House, Trump described the strikes as a coordinated effort between the U.S. and Israel, stating, “We’ve gone a long way to erasing this horrible threat to the American ally.”
He praised the military for what he called an operation that the world had not witnessed in decades, hinting that further military action could follow depending on Iran’s response.
“There will be either peace, or there will be tragedy for Iran far greater than we have witnessed over the last eight days. Remember, there are many targets left,” Trump warned, emphasizing the U.S. military’s readiness for additional strikes if required.
The President monitored the operation from the Situation Room alongside his national security team, illustrating the serious nature of the engagement.
Earlier in the day, B-2 stealth bombers had departed from Missouri, flying west across the Pacific, with specific reports highlighting the aircraft’s unique ability to carry the GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator — a 30,000-pound bomb designed to penetrate fortified structures.
Fordow, built into a mountain, is particularly difficult to target, making the use of such advanced munitions critical to the strike’s success.
Updates from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed that as of Sunday morning, no increase in off-site radiation levels had been reported at the targeted sites following the U.S. incursion.
IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has called for an emergency meeting of the agency’s board to address the situation, highlighting the potential global implications of the military action.
On the Iranian side, officials reported no signs of radiation contamination at the sites post-attack.
This military action places the United States in direct confrontation with Iran, representing a significant escalation of hostilities.
Following the strikes, Trump spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who expressed gratitude for the U.S. support and commended Trump for his leadership.
Both leaders recognize the significance of this moment in their ongoing efforts to counter Iran’s nuclear ambitions, which have been a focal point of U.S. Middle East policy.
The recent military engagement stands in contrast to previous statements from Trump, who only two days prior had suggested that negotiations with Iran might be possible in the near future.
In a statement made Thursday, Trump indicated that he would assess the potential for diplomatic resolution over the next two weeks, which illustrates the profound shift in strategy that has now taken place.
Behind the scenes, the Trump administration had been working on potential agreements concerning Iran’s nuclear program, with reports indicating that Trump had previously urged restraint from Netanyahu in terms of military strikes.
Now, however, with U.S. forces actively engaged, the diplomatic avenues appear to have closed off completely.
Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had warned of severe repercussions should the United States engage militarily, stating that any such action would result in damages that the U.S. would be unable to recover from.
In response to the military strikes, Iran’s permanent mission to the United Nations condemned the U.S. actions, pointing to them as unlawful and a violation of international law.
The Iranian government insists that both Washington and Tel Aviv will be held accountable for what they describe as aggressive actions against the sovereignty of Iran.
In light of the recent escalation, analysts are speculating on the potential for Iranian retaliation.
One concerning scenario involves the Strait of Hormuz, a critical global transit point for oil.
There are fears that Iran may deploy landmines in the strait, effectively blocking one of the world’s most vital shipping routes, which could have considerable implications for the global economy.
Helima Croft from RBC Capital Markets noted reports of Iran’s aggressive jamming of ship transponders, indicating heightened tensions and the potential for disruptive actions in this crucial waterway.
Countries such as QatarEnergy and the Greek Shipping Ministry have already issued advisories for vessels to steer clear of the strait amid fears of increased hostilities.
Historically, U.S. presidents have maintained that Iran must not acquire nuclear weapons, a stance that Trump also reiterated by withdrawing from the nuclear agreement established by the Obama administration in 2015.
The renewed military action represents a significant departure from previous engagements, marking a new phase in the ongoing conflict centered on Iran’s nuclear capabilities.
Moreover, while former Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified that U.S. intelligence found no evidence of Iran actively pursuing a nuclear weapon, Trump has consistently dismissed such assessments.
For now, as the situation unfolds, all eyes will remain on the actions taken by both Iran and the U.S. in the days and weeks to come.
image source from：nbcphiladelphia
