A recent analysis by the Commonwealth Fund has shed light on the states with the best and worst health care systems in the United States, measuring performance across 50 different criteria.
At the forefront of this list are Massachusetts, Hawaii, New Hampshire, and Rhode Island, celebrated for their effective health care systems. Conversely, Mississippi has been identified as the state with the least effective medical care services.
The significance of these findings cannot be overstated, particularly as many Americans grapple with the escalating costs associated with health care and the challenges related to accessing medical services.
Key determinants in the ranking of states included whether they had embraced the Medicaid eligibility expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). States that chose not to expand Medicaid often performed poorly in comparison to their counterparts that did.
President Donald Trump’s recent proposal for a health bill referred to as the “Big Beautiful Bill” does not include provisions to renew enhanced ACA tax credits, which are set to expire this year. Furthermore, the bill suggests substantial cuts to the Medicaid program and introduces new eligibility requirements, raising concerns among critics regarding its potential negative impact on health outcomes.
Highlighted in the analysis was the significant effect the ACA’s Medicaid expansion has had, reportedly contributing to approximately 27,000 lives being saved among adults with low incomes, according to data compiled by the Commonwealth Fund.
The Commonwealth Fund emphasized the importance of geographic location in determining access to affordable health coverage and quality care, stating, “When it comes to having affordable health coverage, access to good-quality care, and the ability to lead a healthy life, where you live matters.”
This statement underscores the striking disparities in premature, avoidable deaths across states, highlighting that in West Virginia, the rate of such deaths was over twice that of Massachusetts.
The rankings presented by the Commonwealth Fund were based on a wide-ranging analysis of various health care access and affordability measures, prevention and treatment options, avoidable hospital usage and costs, health outcomes, healthy behaviors, income disparities, and equity.
The overall rankings of states revealed:
1. Massachusetts
2. Hawaii
3. New Hampshire
4. Rhode Island
5. District of Columbia
6. New York
7. Maryland
8. Vermont
9. Washington
10. Colorado
11. Connecticut
12. Oregon
13. Pennsylvania
14. Virginia
15. Minnesota
16. New Jersey
17. Utah
18. Iowa
19. Idaho
20. California
21. Maine
22. North Dakota
23. Michigan
24. Nebraska
25. Delaware
26. Wisconsin
27. Illinois
28. Montana
29. North Carolina
30. Ohio
31. New Mexico
32. South Dakota
33. Kansas
34. Arizona
35. Indiana
36. South Carolina
37. Kentucky
38. Alaska
39. Florida
40. Wyoming
41. Louisiana
42. Alabama
43. Missouri
44. Tennessee
45. Georgia
46. Nevada
47. West Virginia
48. Arkansas
49. Oklahoma
50. Texas
51. Mississippi
Explaining why states like Massachusetts and Rhode Island excelled in their rankings, Vivian Ho, chair in health economics at Rice University, highlighted that their expansion of Medicaid under the ACA greatly improved the affordability of health care and health insurance. Furthermore, these states have actively worked to monitor and control hospital care costs, a crucial factor amid rising health care expenditures.
Ho pointed out that states such as Massachusetts and Rhode Island have also invested substantially in their public health systems, leading to better prevention measures against debilitating diseases.
On the other end of the spectrum, Arkansas, West Virginia, and Mississippi fall into the highest Federal Medical Assistance Percentage category under Medicaid, indicating the poor household income among their populations. As such, a larger portion of their residents require financial assistance to access health care, which remains unaffordable for many.
Despite their top rankings, even Massachusetts has areas of concern. While it leads the country overall, it ranks poorly in certain aspects of care for elderly patients, notably regarding preventable hospitalizations and hospital readmissions.
Mississippi, while at the bottom of the rankings, shows some strengths, notably its higher spending on primary care, which places it in the top quartile despite its overall low ranking.
The disparities in health care quality across states are attributed at least in part to policy choices made by state officials. Decisions on expanding Medicaid, ensuring access to a full range of reproductive care services, and increasing investments in primary care significantly influence state performance.
The report raises additional troubling findings regarding avoidable mortality rates. The U.S. has seen higher rates compared to other affluent nations, and alarmingly, these figures are not declining but on the rise.
Ho mentions that several unique factors contribute to this issue, including the opioid crisis, widespread vaccine misinformation, and the U.S. being distinctive among developed countries in terms of health insurance coverage.
A substantial racial disparity in avoidable mortality is also noted, with studies revealing that in 42 states, the rate of avoidable mortality for Black individuals is at least double that of the group with the lowest mortality rates.
Commenting on these systemic issues, Ho stated, “The American public doesn’t understand that consolidated healthcare systems are charging prices that earn them extraordinary profits, which raises the costs of employer-provided health insurance.”
Nicole Maestas, a professor of economics and health care policy at Harvard Medical School, echoed similar concerns about policy choices as a driving factor behind differences in state health care systems, emphasizing that states opting to expand Medicaid have seen improvements in access, affordability, and health for their citizens.
As the analysis underscores the crucial impact that policymakers have on health care services, the proposed changes in Trump’s new health bill could potentially remodel the landscape of health care provision and accessibility across states in the upcoming months.
image source from：newsweek
