Saturday

07-05-2025 Vol 2012

Austin City Council Reconsidering Use of Automated License Plate Readers Amid Civil Liberties Concerns

The recent push by the Austin Police Department (APD) to extend its pilot program utilizing Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) has ignited a fierce debate concerning civil liberties in the city.

Every day, news reports of masked individuals, possibly associated with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), appearing in immigrant communities amplify the fear regarding mass surveillance and the potential misuse of data.

City Council Member Mike Siegel highlighted troubling allegations during a work session on June 3, suggesting that ICE may be using data networks created by ALPRs to locate individuals in these communities.

ALPR systems comprise cameras capable of capturing thousands of images of license plates per minute and are located at traffic signals and police vehicles, thereby enabling law enforcement to monitor citizens’ movements throughout the city.

As many as 75% to 93% of large urban areas have adopted ALPR programs, and Austin commenced its pilot program in 2023 through a partnership with Flock Safety, a private firm.

While police officials tout the program’s effectiveness in solving serious crimes and recovering stolen vehicles, widespread community fears have led to doubts about the implications for residents’ rights and privacy.

Following public outcry, the Austin City Council allowed its contract with Flock Safety to expire on July 1, a move reflecting the citizens’ concerns about civil liberties.

Council Member Mike Siegel asserted, “The only secure data is data that is never collected.”

At the June 3 work session, tech worker Laura Carbonneau voiced her worries about the program, remarking how the political climate has shifted since the pilot’s inception.

She emphasized that under the current administration, there is a distinct lack of respect for the rule of law and due process, conditions she argued were unthinkable previously.

Carbonneau’s passionate appeal came amid rising concerns over contracts involving major data companies like Palantir, which was recently disclosed to be developing a comprehensive governmental database to track Americans.

Following her comments, both APD Chief Lisa Davis and Assistant Chief Scott Askew urged the council to extend the partnership with Flock, asserting that community concerns could be mitigated with proper stipulations in a renewed contract.

However, Council members Krista Laine, Mark Duchen, Natasha Harper-Madison, and Chito Vela voiced skepticism regarding the program’s impact on civil rights.

Siegel played a video that articulated the arguments against the program and raised awareness about the contract’s troubling terms, which ultimately permit Flock a broad, unrestricted license to use and share the agency data.

In light of these discussions, City Manager T.C. Broadnax decided to cancel the scheduled vote on extending the Flock contract, which was expected on June 5.

Siegel conveyed expectations to the Chronicle that APD may return to ask for ALPR authorization in the fall with a different contractor overseeing the program.

He expressed doubt about any vendor’s capacity to manage data responsibly, noting that such companies are typically driven by profit motives that prioritize data collection and the creation of digital profiles on citizens.

Adding further context to the ongoing debate, Sam Benavides of the Caldwell/Hays Examiner observed the work session to bolster her arguments against similar proposals in San Marcos.

After public comments lasting three hours, the San Marcos City Council rejected the idea to expand Flock camera use in their police department.

Benavides declared, “I believe we’re the first city in the state of Texas to formally vote against expanding Flock cameras for the police department,” a move she noted could set an encouraging precedent for other municipalities concerned about surveillance overreach.

As discourse regarding the role of surveillance technology continues to intensify in Texas, councils across the state now face pressing questions about balancing public safety with the imperative of safeguarding residents’ rights.

image source from:austinchronicle

Charlotte Hayes