Candidates for the District 7 seat on the Boston City Council have taken starkly different stances regarding the implementation of safe injection sites in response to the city’s ongoing struggle with addiction and substance abuse.
The dialogue surrounding these facilities has gained momentum following recent discussions within the Boston City Council, indicating a readiness to consider such options.
Rev. Miniard Culpepper and Said ‘Coach’ Ahmed, who recently emerged as the top two candidates in a recount from the September 9 preliminary election, are now preparing for the final race to fill the seat vacated by former Councilor Tania Fernandes Anderson, who resigned after pleading guilty to federal theft and wire fraud charges.
Located in Roxbury, the district includes areas near “Mass. and Cass,” a site notoriously known for high instances of homelessness, substance addiction, and associated public safety issues.
Culpepper has been vocal about his support for safe injection sites, emphatically stating that their establishment is crucial in addressing addiction.
In a recent interview, he expressed, “I think you almost have to have safe injection sites.”
He dismissed concerns from opponents who argue that such sites might normalize drug use, referring to those worries as a mere fallacy.
Culpepper highlighted the dangers posed by discarded needles in public spaces, recounting an incident earlier this year when a child in South Boston was pricked by a needle in a park.
“I live on Seaver Street,” Culpepper shared. “I’ve found needles. My dog has found needles in the yard. … I think the safe injection sites give those that are struggling with the disease of addiction at least a safe place to properly dispose of those needles.”
Conversely, Ahmed expressed a more cautious approach regarding safe injection sites.
“I just want to see the full, the benefits and effects that it has for District 7, specifically District 7,” he stated, noting that he requires further research to understand the implications and potential advantages of such facilities.
He posed critical questions regarding the locations of any proposed safe injection sites and their impact on the community, asking, “Where is this going to be exactly? Who [was] there before that?”
This disagreement over safe injection sites is expected to be a topic of discussion in the upcoming term as one candidate is elected in November.
Recent actions by the Boston City Council signal a shift towards supporting safe injection sites, having recently rejected a resolution that aimed to prohibit them.
Councilors from surrounding districts, including John FitzGerald and Ed Flynn, voiced their support for facilities designed to help address homeless and addiction issues, indicating that they see safe injection sites as a way to decentralize and manage these complex problems more effectively.
FitzGerald highlighted promising data revealing a significant decline in opioid-related overdose deaths in Massachusetts over the past year, advocating for a focus on enhancing the care system rather than rejecting potential solutions.
On the ground, residents living near Mass. and Cass have expressed their frustrations concerning the visible signs of drug use and homelessness that are prevalent in their neighborhoods.
Many locals fear that if safe injection sites are established anywhere in Massachusetts, it could lead to one being situated in their community, thus exacerbating existing problems.
The debate over safe injection sites has been a contentious issue at the State House as well.
Despite efforts last year by lawmakers to create a compromise regarding safe injection sites, discussions failed to yield a consensus, leading to the proposal’s stagnation.
Challenging this status quo, a recent hearing by the state’s Joint Committee on Mental Health, Substance Use and Recovery revealed overwhelming support for safe injection sites among those testifying, even in the face of U.S. Attorney Leah Foley’s statement categorically declaring such sites as illegal.
Boston Mayor Michelle Wu has also shown her support for the concept, despite the city’s current lack of proposals for implementation.
As candidates continue to campaign, the differing perspectives on safe injection sites reflect larger societal debates around addiction and the best paths forward for communities grappling with these issues.
image source from：wgbh
