A legal battle has begun following Governor JB Pritzker’s announcement regarding the deployment of National Guard troops in Chicago.
This deployment, which includes about 300 Illinois guard members and an additional 400 from Texas, has sparked controversy and raised alarms about federal overreach.
The lawsuit claims that these actions by President Donald Trump represent unlawful incursions and a dangerous escalation in what the complaint terms as Trump’s ‘War’ on Chicago and Illinois.
According to the lawsuit, Americans should not endure what it describes as ‘occupation’ by the U.S. military, especially when such actions are motivated by political tensions between city or state leadership and the federal government.
In response, Governor Pritzker has criticized the potential deployment, characterizing it as ‘Trump’s invasion’ and has called for Texas Governor Greg Abbott to intervene and block the measures.
Governor Abbott, however, has defended the crackdown, emphasizing its necessity in protecting federal workers engaged in immigration enforcement in Chicago.
White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson confirmed President Trump’s authorization for the deployment, citing what she referred to as ongoing ‘violent riots and lawlessness’ not adequately addressed by local authorities.
Residents of Chicago are increasingly uneasy with the presence of armed Border Patrol agents targeting immigrant-heavy neighborhoods.
Protests have surged in the city, particularly near immigration facilities, culminating in the arrests of 13 protesters last Friday outside a U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement processing site in Broadview.
The situation escalated over the weekend when the Department of Homeland Security acknowledged that federal agents had shot a woman in Chicago after being involved in a vehicle incident with Border Patrol agents.
Tricia McLaughlin, a spokesperson for the DHS, mentioned that no law enforcement officers sustained serious injuries during the incident.
In another ongoing situation, a U.S. District Judge in Portland, Karin Immergut, recently granted a temporary restraining order that halted the deployment of National Guard troops from Oregon and California.
Despite sustaining protests outside the Portland ICE facility, these demonstrations have been less chaotic compared to those seen in 2020 which erupted after George Floyd’s death.
Judge Immergut expressed skepticism about the legality of deploying troops from California and Texas, questioning whether the defendants were circumventing her previous order.
She noted that claims made by the Trump administration about crime levels in Portland seemed disconnected from the current reality on the ground.
Crime rates in Portland have seen a notable decline, with a recent report indicating homicides fell by 51% in the first half of this year compared to the same time frame in 2024.
Since his second term began, President Trump has expressed intentions to deploy troops to ten U.S. cities, including Baltimore, Memphis, the District of Columbia, New Orleans, and several locations in California.
In September, a federal judge stated that the administration had ‘willfully’ violated federal laws by deploying guard troops to Los Angeles amidst immigration protests.
The conflict over the National Guard deployment continues to ignite intense discussions about federal authority and the local response to immigration issues across America.
image source from：pbs
