In New York City, taxpayers are significantly backing the mayoral campaign of Democratic Socialist Zohran Mamdani, who has raised nearly $16 million, including $5 million in cash on hand. This impressive fundraising effort allows Mamdani to outpace his opponents in private donations as he heads into the November general election.
The city’s public-financing program, designed to empower less-known candidates without corporate or special-interest backing, amplifies small-dollar contributions—potentially leading to abuses in the system. Mamdani’s campaign appears to be one such case, raising concerns over the potential influence of extremist groups on his political ambitions.
Mamdani’s financial backing comes from organizations characterized by experts as connected to extremism, notably including the Islamic Circle of North America (ICNA). This Muslim nonprofit has been associated with Jamaat-e-Islami, a South Asian Islamist group known for its violent agenda. Notably, the former head of ICNA’s New York chapter, Ashrafuzzaman Khan, has been sentenced to death for his involvement in war crimes in Bangladesh.
Five ICNA staff members contributed a total of $1,300 to Mamdani’s campaign, which, after the city’s matching funds, amounted to $7,700. Additionally, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), known for its controversial positions and ties to Hamas, provided a $100,000 boost to a PAC associated with Mamdani. Several CAIR officials also made smaller contributions, which further multiply in value through matching city funds.
Moreover, contributions have come from various Islamist individuals and organizations outside New York City. Among them is the Illinois Muslim Political Action Committee, which has ties to individuals involved with a suburban Chicago mosque linked to Hamas and accused of funding terrorism. This group, too, donated significantly to Mamdani’s campaign.
Mamdani’s political influence extends to academia, with a considerable amount of contributions sourced from local university staff. Faculty members from institutions like Columbia University and New York University have donated extensively to his campaign, with some academic figures noted for their critical views of Israel. This includes a significant number of contributions during sensitive periods, which raises questions about their motivations.
The donations, exceeding $105,000 from academics, could result in as much as $690,000 when factoring in matching funds—indicating an organizing effort that may not classify as an official PAC but functions effectively as a special-interest group.
Individuals and organizations that have contributed to Mamdani’s campaign often uphold radical agendas, including Marxism and intersectionality. Some prominent supporters also include academics known for controversial stances on issues regarding gender violence, cultural relativism, and historical connections to organizations designated as terrorist during key periods.
Despite the debates surrounding Mamdani’s campaign, supporters defend his platform, arguing that the concerns raised about extremism are unfounded. Media sources have depicted Mamdani as a grassroots candidate focused on working-class issues, suggesting a disconnect between his backers’ backgrounds and the public’s perception of his agenda.
While Jewish media outlets have labeled allegations of antisemitism against Mamdani as attempts to delegitimize his candidacy, closer examination of his funding sources displays a complex web of alliances extending into both radical leftist and Islamist territories. This intersection raises significant concerns for voters in New York, particularly regarding the implications of electing a candidate with such ideologically charged support.
Zohran Mamdani’s campaign illustrates a troubling convergence of financial backing from extremist organizations, potentially steering local governance in a direction influenced by these connections. The outcome of the upcoming election may determine whether New Yorkers elect a mayor aligned alongside these divisive groups, prompting critical scrutiny of campaign financing and its broader implications for city leadership.
image source from：meforum
