The functioning of cities is heavily reliant on tax revenue, from funding pothole repairs to garbage collection and firefighting. For Los Angeles residents, understanding how their property tax dollars are allocated this year is essential in holding city leaders accountable, especially amid a financial crisis exacerbated by overspending.
To help residents see their contributions, a calculator has been introduced to break down property tax expenditures on city services. Homeowners pay property taxes directly, while renters indirectly contribute through their rent, as increased property taxes often lead to higher rent prices.
This tool specifically tracks property tax contributions because they account for roughly a third of the city’s general fund, which serves as L.A.’s primary account for financing public services such as police, fire, parks, and libraries. Other revenue streams, including sales taxes, business taxes, and parking fees, add to the total contributions but are more complex to measure individually.
For those residing outside of Los Angeles, the financial breakdown differs, and detailed calculations for other cities within the county or various government departments, such as school districts, are not yet available.
To find out how much property tax you paid this year, residents can use the median property tax bill of $5,438 as a benchmark. If you prefer a more tailored figure, you can locate your property tax bill by following these steps:
1. Visit the L.A. County Assessor’s website and input your address to find your 10-digit Assessor’s Identification Number (AIN).
2. Enter your AIN into the calculator to access your most recent property tax bill.
3. Look for the General Tax Levy amount at the top right of your bill, which reflects the portion that funds city and county services.
For residents in large apartment buildings, dividing this total by the number of units allows you to estimate your contribution.
The site’s calculator will provide insights into how property tax payments support essential city services. Understanding the current discussions city leaders have regarding spending allows residents to be informed about budget priorities and areas of concern.
Key focus areas in discussions include the budgets for the police and fire departments, which typically consume the largest portion of city funding yet face staffing shortages.
One significant aspect of the Police Department’s funding is that over 95% is derived from the general fund, but the number of sworn officers has decreased in recent years — dropping from about 10,000 to roughly 8,700 amid ongoing recruitment challenges.
To encourage recruitment, Mayor Karen Bass has supported a four-year plan to increase officers’ salaries by $1 billion, a measure approved by the L.A. City Council. However, this means that taxpayer contributions to the LAPD will remain elevated until the current contract runs out in 2027.
Turning to the Fire Department, its budget has similarly become a topic of discussion particularly following recent fire emergencies.
Almost the entirety of its funding is sourced from the general fund, with less than 1% coming from a half-cent sales tax imposed for local public safety services.
Despite warnings from fire officials about understaffing leading to inadequate emergency services, the department’s budget was enhanced in 2024 with a contract for increased pay and better equipment, although officials assert that these funds are insufficient to tackle the staffing shortages effectively.
The proposed budget for 2025-26 includes a plan to increase the department’s staffing by 227 positions, equating to a 6% growth.
A notable and burdensome expense for L.A. taxpayers comes from contributions towards retirement and pension funds for city employees, amounting to $1.4 billion this year — approximately 17.9% of the general fund.
A recent change included Measure FF, which elevated pension costs, allowing several civilian peace officers to shift to a more generous pension scheme intended for police and fire personnel.
When economic conditions weaken — like poor stock market performance — the city may be compelled to increase contributions to pension funds, resulting in a greater financial impact on Angelenos’ tax contributions.
Moreover, spending on programs aimed at addressing homelessness exemplifies the breadth of funds allocated for social services.
Out of the initial budget of $337 million for homelessness, only around $70 million was explicitly included in the calculator, which encompasses services such as the Inside Safe initiative, designed to provide temporary accommodations for unhoused residents.
Additional resources come from state and federal grants, as well as voter-approved taxes like Measure ULA, which designates a percentage of high-value property sales for addressing homelessness initiatives.
Further complexities arise with ongoing budgetary considerations; the current budget for homelessness has been reduced by approximately 5% for the upcoming fiscal year, despite initial allocations being set for high-impact programs.
Los Angeles also currently faces significant liabilities, with expected payouts exceeding $300 million for various claims against the city, especially concerning issues like housing discrimination or decaying infrastructure — an amount exceeding the allocated budget by several times over.
Addressing sanitation, it should be noted that approximately 20% of the Bureau of Sanitation’s budget is sourced from the general fund, complemented by fees paid by residents for waste management and recycling services.
With increasing costs and staffing shortages, proposals to raise trash collection fees are tabled for discussion, considering that the department may need to rely on general funds for a larger portion of budgets in the future.
When examining street lighting services, the funding picture is a bit more nuanced.
A significant portion of the budget stems from a dedicated property tax specifically allocated for street lighting, detailed on property tax bills under “Direct Assessments”.
Due to a lack of increase in the street lighting fee for over two decades, budget constraints have put stress on service delivery amidst rising costs due to thefts and outages.
In the previous budget, nearly 17% of the Bureau of Street Lighting positions were cut, and further reductions are anticipated in the forthcoming fiscal year.
In summary, a clear understanding of how tax dollars are spent is essential for all Los Angeles residents.
Navigating property tax contributions offers insight into city service financing and helps cultivate a sense of accountability.
As discussions over departmental budgets continue amidst an economic backdrop, access to these figures can empower residents to engage meaningfully with local governance.
image source from：https://laist.com/news/politics/want-to-know-how-much-you-paid-for-la-city-services-this-year-try-our-calculator
