A recent report from the Boston Policy Institute has sounded alarm bells regarding the commercial real estate landscape in Boston, particularly as the city approaches its mayoral election.
The report, developed by the Center for State Policy Analysis at Tufts University, forecasts a troubling decline in office values, anticipated to plummet between 35% to 45% from 2024 levels.
This dramatic drop could widen Boston’s fiscal budget shortfall from $135 million this year to over $550 million by fiscal 2029, accumulating a staggering total of $1.7 billion over the next five years.
According to the report, this destabilization of the office market is not a failure of city leadership but rather a result of significant shifts in work habits and a rise in borrowing costs.
These trends threaten not only the city’s financial stability but are also likely to burden residents and crucial city services heavily reliant on property tax revenues.
The report presents a range of politically unpalatable options for city leaders, including either gradual increases in residential property tax rates or holding tax rates steady coupled with substantial cuts to spending.
“There’s no magic here,” the report asserts. “The way shortfalls get filled, in the current budget process, is through automatic tax rate increases… Large rate hikes carry substantial economic and political risk.”
Moreover, the report emphasizes that commercial properties can ill-afford the burden of new taxes, warning that any new tax impositions could exacerbate existing challenges in the already struggling office sector.
High-profile buildings in Boston have reportedly been sold at discounts ranging from 50% to 70%, with office vacancy rates climbing from 8% in 2019 to a staggering 24% today.
The report points out that Boston relies more heavily on commercial property taxes compared to other major U.S. cities; commercial taxes make up a third of the city’s budget versus only about 10% in a typical city.
This reliance on commercial properties, once viewed as a stable revenue source that could weather economic fluctuations, has now turned into a liability.
“The scale of the challenge facing Boston is immense,” the report notes, urging a complete re-evaluation of the city’s approaches to taxation and budgeting.
It emphasizes that the dwindling demand for office space is not a transient issue but requires a sustainable and transparent reassessment of budgetary priorities to ensure the economic future of the city.
Gregory Maynard, the Executive Director of the Boston Policy Institute, remarked on the broader implications of the report, stating that the challenges inherent to Boston’s commercial real estate market reflect wider issues affecting cities throughout Massachusetts.
“Boston is not the only city in Massachusetts with a lot of offices… So this is a Boston issue, but it’s really also a statewide issue,” he noted.
On the topic of the report’s findings, Mayor Michelle Wu pointed out the institute’s previous opposition to a compromise she negotiated to shield residential taxpayers from significant tax hikes by shifting a greater burden onto commercial property owners.
“We are going to continue to celebrate and highlight the progress that we have made, while continuing to double down on believing in Boston and working alongside those who are making decisions to invest in our downtown neighborhoods and in our city,” she stated.
Wu further asserted that others may choose to endorse what she described as a “shadowy organization” that seeks to undermine the city’s accomplishments by demanding higher taxes on residents.
Josh Kraft, who is challenging Wu for the mayoral position, criticized her tax shift strategy, calling it potentially disastrous for the small businesses that contribute to the unique character of Boston’s neighborhoods.
“Leadership requires acknowledging hard truths, not wishing them away,” Kraft remarked. “It is now clear that commercial real estate values are going to continue to decline and have a negative impact on future city budgets.”
He proposed a two-part strategy to address this financial challenge, emphasizing the need for policies that promote growth and budget savings.
Last year, the Boston City Council, alongside Wu, pursued legislation aimed at redistributing the property tax burden more heavily onto commercial property owners, a measure that passed the House but faltered in the Senate.
The city has since filed a new home rule petition in February regarding this issue, with the House referring it to the Joint Committee on Revenue; however, it remains stalled pending a Senate referral.
Wu addressed concerns about the legislative process, stating, “We continue to be available to answer any questions… This is a proposal that’s been vetted for well over a year now.”
As the city navigates these complexities, the focus remains on finding solutions that support Boston’s residents and businesses in the face of a challenging commercial real estate landscape.
image source from：https://www.masslive.com/boston/2025/06/plummeting-office-values-could-cost-boston-17b-over-5-years-report-warns.html
