The economic policies set forth by President Donald Trump have ignited fears of impending calamity for the U.S. economy, particularly affecting states like Alaska.
The unilateral imposition of tariffs, along with significant tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans and the radical restructuring of federal departments and workforce, has raised alarms about its repercussions.
Critics argue that the trade war initiated by the Trump administration will not achieve its intended goals of reducing the U.S. trade deficit or revitalizing American manufacturing. Tariffs imposed on essential materials such as steel, aluminum, and automobiles are anticipated to inflate costs for American businesses and consumers alike.
Furthermore, the revenue generated by these tariffs can barely offset the substantial losses incurred from tax cuts, leading to a concerning fiscal imbalance.
The Department of Government Efficiency’s aggressive reduction of federal employees has underscored risks to critical health, safety, and welfare services. These developments have dire implications for both immediate and long-term agency functions, particularly in a time of economic distress.
The economic implications are severe not only for the nation but also particularly for Alaska. Each element of the fiscal plan poses unique risks:
Starting with the trade wars, President Trump’s imposition of tariffs is perceived as a heavy-handed act that will ultimately burden American manufacturers with increased costs for imported goods. The cascading effect of these tariffs is akin to a regressive sales tax, disproportionately impacting lower- and middle-income households.
Currently, the sales tax rate on imported goods has surged to 17.8 percent, a significant jump from pre-2025 levels. Given that imports constitute over 11 percent of the GDP, the impending inflationary pressures on consumer prices send ripples through the economy, contributing to a growing decline in consumer sentiment.
Additionally, the inconsistent implementation of tariff policies undermines business investment, as predictability is essential for fiscal stability. As it stands, the president’s unilateral authority to impose these tariffs lacks legal backing without congressional approval.
For a state like Alaska, which is positioned at the frontier of global logistics, the ramifications of the current cost structure and disrupted supply chains have begun to surface, eroding the local economy. The effects include:
1) Weakened crude oil pricing, which threatens state royalty and tax revenues, Permanent Fund earnings, and perceptions of oil company capital projects.
2) Disruption in the Alaska seafood market due to retaliatory tariffs from China and other Asia-Pacific nations.
3) Decreased tourism bookings, negatively impacting local businesses.
4) Drastic cost increases linked to the Alaska LNG energy lifeline, further straining local budgets.
The outcomes of the trade war appear grim, forecasting an inflationary environment, investment downturns, and an uptick in unemployment amidst rising interest rates. Collectively, these forces move the U.S., and Alaskan, economies closer to a recession.
Shifting focus to the federal budget and proposed tax cuts, a recently passed budget bill is projected to exacerbate national debt to unprecedented levels, potentially reaching $40 trillion by 2035. In light of this, Moody’s has downgraded U.S. government credit ratings, which has, in turn, caused spikes in yields on medium- and long-term U.S. Treasury bonds.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has reported that the proposed tax cuts would lead to reduced after-tax income for the bottom 40% of earners while benefiting the wealthiest 10% of Americans.
Aligning with the anticipated impacts of tariffs, household disposable income in Alaska will likely dwindle as a result of regressive taxation and elevated interest expenses.
Moreover, the proposed budget injects unconscionable cuts into vital safety net programs aimed at the most vulnerable segments of the population. Cuts to healthcare spending—amounting to $715 billion—food stamps—$300 billion—and Medicare—$500 billion—are projected.
Alaska’s Medicaid recipients, numbering around 279,000 individuals, including 109,000 children, could face a staggering $3 billion in uncovered healthcare expenses, leaving them without any alternative safety net.
Additionally, the Department of Government Efficiency has enacted indiscriminate layoffs, eliminating approximately 280,000 federal positions. This approach to reducing waste has raised concerns, particularly regarding the overall impact on the federal workforce.
The ramifications extend to contractors and nonprofit organizations dependent on federal funding, leading to a chain of job losses in related sectors, totaling over 4,400 positions.
In Alaska alone, 15,000 federal employees contribute significantly to the local economy, providing vital public services and bolstering disposable income. Alaska’s federal workforce is characterized by stable, well-paying jobs, primarily focused on year-round employment.
A 15% reduction in this workforce could translate to a staggering $250 million loss in wages, greatly impacting local business expenditures and further spurring negative economic effects.
The cumulative impact of President Trump’s administration policies—ranging from the trade war to tax cuts and drastic workforce reductions—foreshadows chaos and devastation. Even a reduced set of tariffs has resulted in significant destruction within U.S. capital markets and instability in financial markets, alongside the threat of inflation amid sluggish economic growth.
President Trump’s misguided belief that tariffs can effectively address bilateral trade deficits and generate federal revenue is not only flawed but resembles harmful medical treatments for a healthy patient.
The provision of substantial tax cuts to wealthy households mirrors administering steroids to a patient already facing significant health challenges—an affliction exacerbated by needless tariff impositions.
Furthermore, the Department of Government Efficiency’s reckless actions have threatened the federal government’s essential functions, dramatically underscoring its responsibilities in protecting individual rights, managing commerce and infrastructure, and safeguarding the safety net.
In light of these challenges, the Alaska congressional delegation is called upon to unite and advocate for three critical objectives:
• Reinstate congressional authority over tariff-making and assert oversight over the president’s unilateral actions.
• Restore congressional powers pertaining to federal program formation and budgetary spending.
• Foster a federal budget that prioritizes the safety net while maintaining fiscal prudence against deficit expansion.
image source from：https://www.adn.com/opinions/2025/06/08/opinion-a-plea-to-alaskas-congressional-delegation-for-responsible-economic-policy/
