In a shocking response to protests against immigration enforcement, federal troops have been deployed to Los Angeles, raising alarms across the nation regarding constitutional governance.
The deployment comes not in the wake of an insurrection or natural disaster, but in reaction to communities expressing grief and demanding justice.
The backdrop of this situation began when U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) conducted routine raids on June 6, detaining 121 individuals from public spaces around Los Angeles.
These raids occurred in broad daylight, presenting a calculated boldness meant to provoke a response.
Indeed, the community’s reaction was immediate, with protesters gathering downtown, holding signs and chanting “Set them free!” as they voiced their sorrow and anger.
Sadly, in today’s America, even peaceful displays of dissent are often met with governmental oppression.
The local police responded with aggressive force, deploying tear gas and flash-bang grenades, turning what began as a peaceful demonstration into a chaotic scene, not due to the actions of the protesters, but rather the government’s militarized response.
In an escalation that further heightened tensions, President Donald Trump decided to deploy 2,000 National Guard troops to the city, with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth hinting at mobilizing active-duty Marines should protests persist.
The legality surrounding this course of action is deeply questionable.
According to the Insurrection Act, federal troops are only to be deployed following a public proclamation for citizens to disperse, which has not been issued in this case.
Governor Gavin Newsom of California, who possesses authority over state security issues, was not consulted prior to this act; he was merely informed post-deployment.
This situation reveals that there is no widespread rebellion threatening U.S. authority in Los Angeles, just anguished citizens seeking dignity for their communities.
The actions witnessed represent an alarming shift from lawful civil engagement to a form of governance motivated by spectacle and strength rather than adherence to constitutional order.
Should this deployment face legal challenge, it would likely be deemed illegal, yet that possibility underscores a more concerning reality: a move towards governance where legality is secondary to the display of power.
Historically, this moment cannot be perceived in isolation.
As scholar Aime Cesaire famously noted regarding colonialism, violence in peripheral areas often returns to the center of power—an insight that remains valid in the current context.
The United States has witnessed a gradual accumulation of this troubling trend over decades.
Following the 1996 provision in the National Defense Authorization Act, military-grade weapons would be transferred to local police departments, creating a dangerous overlap between military and civilian law enforcement.
Subsequently, with the onset of the
image source from：https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2025/6/9/what-is-happening-in-los-angeles-is-not-law-enforcement-its-occupation
